Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/20526
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGheorghiu, Elenaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKingdom, Frederick A Aen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-25T23:14:07Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-25T23:14:07Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2012-06en_UK
dc.identifier.other20en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/20526-
dc.description.abstractEvidence that contour-shapes and texture-shapes are processed by different mechanisms included the finding that contour-shape aftereffects are reduced when the adaptation stimulus is a texture made of contours rather than a single contour. This phenomenon has been termed texture-surround suppression of contour-shape, or TSSCS. How does TSSCS operate and over what spatial extent? We measured the postadaptation shift in the apparent shape frequency of a single sinusoidal-shaped contour as a function of the number of contours in the adaptor stimulus. Contours were Gabor strings in which the Gabor orientations were either tangential (snakes) or orthogonal (ladders) to the path of the contour. We found that for extended surrounds, the aftereffect was strongly reduced when the surround contours were the same as the central adaptor contour, but not when the Gabors making up the surround contours were opposite-in-orientation to those of the central adaptor. For near surrounds, the aftereffect in a snake contour was unaffected by same-orientation but strongly suppressed by opposite-orientation surrounds, whereas the aftereffect for a ladder-contour was suppressed equally by both same- and opposite-orientation near surrounds. Finally, the strength of surround suppression decreased gradually with increasing spatial separation between center and surround. These results indicate that there are two components to texture-surround suppression in our shape aftereffect: one that is sensitive to opposite-orientation texture surrounds, operates locally, and disrupts contour-processing; the other that is sensitive to same-orientation texture surrounds, is spatially extended, and prevents the shape of the contour from being processed as a contour. We also demonstrate that the observed shape aftereffects are not due to changes in the apparent shape-frequency of the adaptors or the precision with which their shape-frequency is encoded, indicating that TSSCS is not an instance of crowding.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmologyen_UK
dc.relationGheorghiu E & Kingdom FAA (2012) Local and global components of texture-surround suppression of contour-shape coding. Journal of Vision, 12 (6), Art. No.: 20. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.6.20en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjecttextureen_UK
dc.subjectcontouren_UK
dc.subjectshapeen_UK
dc.subjectsurround-suppressionen_UK
dc.subjectadaptationen_UK
dc.subjectaftereffecten_UK
dc.subjectcrowdingen_UK
dc.titleLocal and global components of texture-surround suppression of contour-shape codingen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Gheorghiu and Kingdom (2012b).pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/12.6.20en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid22707427en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Visionen_UK
dc.citation.issn1534-7362en_UK
dc.citation.volume12en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailelena.gheorghiu@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMcGill Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000306337600020en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid701570en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9459-1969en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-06-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-06-25en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorGheorghiu, Elena|0000-0002-9459-1969en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKingdom, Frederick A A|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameGheorghiu and Kingdom (2012b).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gheorghiu and Kingdom (2012b).pdfFulltext - Published Version3.27 MBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.