Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/20217
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDombrowski, Stephan Uen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKnittle, Keegan Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAvenell, Alisonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAraujo-Soares, Veraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSniehotta, Falko Fen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-25T23:07:58Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-25T23:07:58Z-
dc.date.issued2014-05en_UK
dc.identifier.otherg2646en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/20217-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To systematically review and describe currently available approaches to supporting maintenance of weight loss in obese adults and to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources: Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Study selection: Studies were identified through to January 2014. Randomised trials of interventions to maintain weight loss provided to initially obese adults (aged ≥18) after weight loss of ≥5% body weight with long term (≥12 months) follow-up of weight change (main outcome) were included. Study appraisal and synthesis: Potential studies were screened independently and in duplicate; study characteristics and outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the effects of interventions on weight loss maintenance with the inverse variance method and a random effects model. Results are presented as mean differences in weight change, with 95% confidence intervals. Results: 45 trials involving 7788 individuals were included. Behavioural interventions focusing on both food intake and physical activity resulted in an average difference of -1.56 kg (95% confidence interval -2.27 to -0.86 kg; 25 comparisons, 2949 participants) in weight regain compared with controls at 12 months. Orlistat combined with behavioural interventions resulted in a -1.80 kg (-2.54 to -1.06; eight comparisons, 1738 participants) difference compared with placebo at 12 months. All orlistat studies reported higher frequencies of adverse gastrointestinal events in the experimental compared with placebo control groups. A dose-response relation for orlistat treatment was found, with 120 mg doses three times a day leading to greater weight loss maintenance (-2.34 kg, -3.03 to -1.65) compared with 60 mg and 30 mg three times a day (-0.70 kg, 95% confidence interval -1.92 to 0.52), P=0.02. Conclusions: Behavioural interventions that deal with both diet and physical activity show small but significant benefits on weight loss maintenance.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationDombrowski SU, Knittle KP, Avenell A, Araujo-Soares V & Sniehotta FF (2014) Long term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 348, Art. No.: g2646. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2646en_UK
dc.rightsJournal is open-access. Open access publishing allows free access to and distribution of published articles where the author retains copyright of their work by employing a Creative Commons attribution licence. Proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details should be given.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/en_UK
dc.titleLong term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trialsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmj.g2646en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid25134100en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJen_UK
dc.citation.issn1756-1833en_UK
dc.citation.issn0959-8138en_UK
dc.citation.volume348en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emails.u.dombrowski@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000336154300001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84901010243en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid886474en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9832-2777en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-05-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-05-16en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDombrowski, Stephan U|0000-0001-9832-2777en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKnittle, Keegan P|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAvenell, Alison|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAraujo-Soares, Vera|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSniehotta, Falko F|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2014-05-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2014-05-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/|2014-05-31|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameBMJ 2014.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0959-8138en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
BMJ 2014.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.