Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMunday, Ian-
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, Alexis P. S.-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis sets out to critically examine the field of higher education development, as one which is focused on socio-economic inequality and welfare, and determines educational purpose in poorer, or ‘developing’, countries accordingly. My question is whether mainstream development approaches to higher education are really contributing to the provision of more equal education services, or whether they risk reintroducing inequality by treating the priorities of poorer countries differently. To investigate whether there are educational values or purposes common to universities globally irrespective of socio-economic imperatives, I begin the study with a historiographical look at their growth in terms of both ideas of its purpose, and how purpose is realised in actuality. I then trace the emergence of the discourse of international development, and the role that higher education has come to play within it, showing how the field of international higher education development has simplified the notion of university purpose for its own devices. The thesis then looks at underlying assumptions about human nature, defined as the problem of humanism, common to both transcendent ideas of university purpose as well as the development discourse. To avoid the limitations of these assumptions, I argue that a theoretical approach is required that can engage with questions of hybridity and multiplicity in both the history and future of universities, without reducing those questions to abstract ideas. The approach I propose draws upon the dialogism of Mikhail Bakhtin, whose multi-layered understanding of language prevents any one understanding of another person, or of human nature more generally, being considered final. The educational implications for such an approach are finally explored in the concept of academic freedom, which is traditionally conceived of as a right, but is here reconceptualised also as a responsibility.en_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjectHigher educationen_GB
dc.subjectInternational developmenten_GB
dc.subjectEducational theoryen_GB
dc.subjectCapabilities approachen_GB
dc.subjectAcademic freedomen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEducation, Higher Developing countriesen_GB
dc.subject.lcshAcademic freedom Developing countriesen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEducation Aims and objectivesen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEducational psychologyen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEducational sociologyen_GB
dc.titleA critical study of international higher education development: capital, capability, and a dialogical proposal for academic freedom as a responsibilityen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ThesisFinal-2.pdf893.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.