|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Essentialist Blindness would not preclude counterfactual knowledge|
|Keywords:||Epistemology of counterfactuals|
Epistemology of modality
|Citation:||Roca-Royes S (2012) Essentialist Blindness would not preclude counterfactual knowledge, Philosophia Scientiae, 16 (2), pp. 149-172.|
|Abstract:||This paper does two things. First, it defends, against a potential threat to it, the claim that a capacity for essentialist knowledge should not be placed among the core capacities for counterfactual knowledge. Second, it assesses a consequence of that claim—or better: of the discussion by means of which I defend it—in relation to Kment's and Williamson's views on the relation between modality and counterfactuals.|
|Rights:||The publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published in Philosophia Scientiae, 2012, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp. 149-172 by Kime Editions. The original publication can be found at: http://philosophiascientiae.revues.org/745|
|Philosophia_Scientiae_EB&CK.pdf||303.43 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.