1. STORRE
  2. Faculty of Arts and Humanities
  3. Law and Philosophy
  4. Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/19908
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoca-Royes, Soniaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-29T23:20:12Z-
dc.date.available2014-04-29T23:20:12Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/19908-
dc.description.abstractThis paper does two things. First, it defends, against a potential threat to it, the claim that a capacity for essentialist knowledge should not be placed among the core capacities for counterfactual knowledge. Second, it assesses a consequence of that claim—or better: of the discussion by means of which I defend it—in relation to Kment's and Williamson's views on the relation between modality and counterfactuals.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherKime Editionsen_UK
dc.relationRoca-Royes S (2012) Essentialist Blindness would not preclude counterfactual knowledge. Philosophia Scientiae, 16 (2), pp. 149-172. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.745en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published in Philosophia Scientiae, 2012, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp. 149-172 by Kime Editions. The original publication can be found at: http://philosophiascientiae.revues.org/745en_UK
dc.subjectEpistemology of counterfactualsen_UK
dc.subjectEpistemology of modalityen_UK
dc.titleEssentialist Blindness would not preclude counterfactual knowledgeen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.4000/philosophiascientiae.745en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePhilosophia Scientiaeen_UK
dc.citation.issn1281-2463en_UK
dc.citation.volume16en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage149en_UK
dc.citation.epage172en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailsonia.rocaroyes@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84873143152en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid724447en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-04-24en_UK
dc.subject.tagEpistemologyen_UK
dc.subject.tagPhilosophy: Metaphysicsen_UK
dc.subject.tagMind and Knowledgeen_UK
dc.subject.tagPhilosophy of Logic and Language, including History of Analytic Philosophyen_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoca-Royes, Sonia|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2014-04-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2014-04-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamePhilosophia_Scientiae_EBCK.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1281-2463en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Philosophia_Scientiae_EBCK.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version303.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright

View License
Show simple item record


Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.