Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/19752
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Exposure of burrowing mammals to 222Rn
Author(s): Beresford, Nicholas A
Barnett, Catherine L
Vives i Batlle, Jordi
Potter, E D
Ibrahimi, Z-F
Barlow, Thomas S
Schieb, C
Jones, David Gwyn
Copplestone, David
Contact Email: david.copplestone@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Radon
Burrowing mammal
Environmental assessment
Dose rate
Background exposure
Issue Date: Aug-2012
Date Deposited: 4-Apr-2014
Citation: Beresford NA, Barnett CL, Vives i Batlle J, Potter ED, Ibrahimi Z, Barlow TS, Schieb C, Jones DG & Copplestone D (2012) Exposure of burrowing mammals to 222Rn. Science of the Total Environment, 431, pp. 252-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.023
Abstract: Estimates of absorbed dose rates to wildlife from exposure to natural background radionuclides are required to put estimates of dose rates arising from regulated releases of radioactivity and proposed benchmarks into context. Recent review papers have estimated dose rates to wildlife from 40K, and 238U and 232Th series radionuclides. However, only one study previous has considered the potential dose rates to burrowing animals from inhaled 222Rn and its daughter products. In this paper we describe a study conducted at seven sites in northwest England. Passive track etch detectors were used to measure the 222Rn concentrations in artificial burrows over a period of approximately one year. Results suggest that absorbed dose rates to burrowing mammals as a consequence of exposure to 222Rn are likely to be at least an order of magnitude higher than those suggested in previous evaluations of natural background exposure rates which had omitted this radionuclide and exposure pathway. Dose rates in some areas of Great Britain will be considerably in excess of incremental no-effects benchmark dose rates suggested for use as screening levels. Such advised benchmark dose rates need to be better put into context with background dose rates, including exposure to 222Rn, to ensure credibility; although the context will be determined by the purpose of the benchmark and the assessment level.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.023
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s): http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SciTotEnv 2012b.pdfFulltext - Published Version493.57 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.