Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/19508
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDemont, Marcoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Oliveren_UK
dc.contributor.authorBussiere, Lucen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:57:10Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:57:10Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2012-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/19508-
dc.description.abstractMolecular techniques have substantially improved our knowledge of postcopulatory sexual selection. Nevertheless, studies examining sperm utilization in natural populations of nonsocial insects are rare, support for sperm selection (biased use of stored sperm, e.g. to match offspring genotypes to prevailing environmental conditions) is elusive, and its relevance within natural populations unknown. We performed an oviposition site choice experiment in the field where female yellow dung flies Scathophaga stercoraria could deposit eggs into three different microenvironments on a dung pat (the east-west ridge, north- or south-exposed side), and genotyped the offspring and sperm remaining in storage after oviposition. Females exhibited plasticity in the number of eggs deposited according to pat age. Additionally, temperature strongly influenced egg placement: the warmer the temperature, the higher the proportion of eggs laid into the north-exposed side of dung. The number of ejaculates in storage differed amongst spermathecae, and females stored sperm from more males than fathered their offspring (2.11 sires vs. 2.84 males within sperm stores). Mean last male paternity was 83.4%, roughly matching previous laboratory estimates. Importantly, we found no evidence that females selectively lay eggs of different genotypes, by biasing paternity towards certain males, depending on offspring's microclimate. Thus, while we show female choice over number of eggs and where these are deposited, there was no evidence for sperm selection. We further revealed positive effects of multiple mating on total number of offspring and proportion of offspring emerging from the dung. We argue that the integration of field studies and laboratory experiments is essential to promote our understanding of polyandry and cryptic female choice.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringeren_UK
dc.relationDemont M, Martin O & Bussiere L (2012) Wild yellow dung fly females may not select sperm based on dung pat microclimate but could nevertheless benefit from polyandry. Evolutionary Ecology, 26 (3), pp. 715-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9519-1en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectPostcopulatory sexual selectionen_UK
dc.subjectCryptic female choiceen_UK
dc.subjectSperm competitionen_UK
dc.subjectScathophagaen_UK
dc.subjectScatophagaen_UK
dc.titleWild yellow dung fly females may not select sperm based on dung pat microclimate but could nevertheless benefit from polyandryen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-06en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Evol Ecol 2012.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10682-011-9519-1en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEvolutionary Ecologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1573-8477en_UK
dc.citation.issn0269-7653en_UK
dc.citation.volume26en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage715en_UK
dc.citation.epage731en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailluc.bussiere@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date05/11/2011en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurichen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationETH Zurichen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000302655200019en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84859559984en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid681474en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8937-8381en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-11-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-03-13en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDemont, Marco|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMartin, Oliver|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBussiere, Luc|0000-0001-8937-8381en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameEvol Ecol 2012.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0269-7653en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Evol Ecol 2012.pdfFulltext - Published Version259.68 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-06    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.