Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/18423
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQuilliam, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorMarsden, Karina A-
dc.contributor.authorGertler, Christoph-
dc.contributor.authorRousk, Johannes-
dc.contributor.authorDeLuca, Thomas H-
dc.contributor.authorJones, David L-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-23T23:14:17Z-
dc.date.issued2012-09-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/18423-
dc.description.abstractEvidence suggests that in addition to sequestering carbon (C), biochar amendment can increase crop yields, improve soil quality and nutrient cycling, reduce the leaching of nutrients from soil and stimulate soil microbial activity. However, biochar application primarily benefits soils of intrinsic poor quality, thus the advantages of adding biochar to temperate agricultural soils remains controversial. In addition, there is limited information about the longer term effects of biochar application, or of increasing the rate of biochar loading to soil. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of biochar residency time and application rate on soil quality, crop performance, weed emergence, microbial growth and community composition in a temperate agricultural soil. We used replicated field plots with three wood biochar application rates (0, 25 and 50 t ha-1). Three years after biochar amendment, the plots were further split and fresh biochar added at two different rates (25 and 50 t ha-1) resulting in double-loaded reapplications of 25 + 25 and 50 + 50 t ha-1. After a soil residency time of three years, there were no significant differences in soil nutrients, microbial growth, mycorrhizal colonisation or weed emergence between biochar amended and unamended soil. In contrast, the reapplication of biochar had a significant effect on soil quality, (e.g. increased PO43-, K+ and Ca2+, DOC, soil moisture, organic matter and EC), microbial growth, (e.g. decreased saprophytic fungal growth), increased mycorrhizal root colonisation and inhibition of weed emergence. Whilst biochar application is unquestionably a strategy for the sequestration of C, in this case, other benefits, e.g. improved soil nutrient levels or crop performance, seemed to be short lived. Reapplication of biochar exemplifies the transient nature of biochar-mediated benefits rather than any lasting differences in soil nutrient dynamics or microbial communities. These results emphasise the need for more long-term field studies to provide data that can meaningfully inform agronomic management decisions and climate change mitigation strategies.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relationQuilliam R, Marsden KA, Gertler C, Rousk J, DeLuca TH & Jones DL (2012) Nutrient dynamics, microbial growth and weed emergence in biochar amended soil are influenced by time since application and reapplication rate, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 158, pp. 192-199.-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subjectBlack carbonen_UK
dc.subjectCarbon sequestrationen_UK
dc.subjectLong term biochar trialen_UK
dc.subjectRepeat biochar applicationen_UK
dc.subjectTemperate agricultureen_UK
dc.titleNutrient dynamics, microbial growth and weed emergence in biochar amended soil are influenced by time since application and reapplication rateen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.011-
dc.citation.jtitleAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment-
dc.citation.issn0167-8809-
dc.citation.volume158-
dc.citation.spage192-
dc.citation.epage199-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.author.emailrichard.quilliam@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciences-
dc.contributor.affiliationBangor University-
dc.contributor.affiliationBangor University-
dc.contributor.affiliationBangor University-
dc.contributor.affiliationBangor University-
dc.contributor.affiliationBangor University-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
dc.identifier.isi000307425700021-
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 2012.pdf769.98 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.