Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/18213
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Carroll, Ronanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSteele, Roberten_UK
dc.contributor.authorLibby, Gillianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrownlee, Lindaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChambers, Julieen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-31T23:15:38Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-31T23:15:38Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09-16en_UK
dc.identifier.other849en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/18213-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the UK. Screening is key to early detection. The Scottish programme of colorectal cancer screening is running successfully, and involves all adults aged between 50 and 74 years being invited to post back a faecal sample for testing every 2 years. However, screening uptake is sub-optimal: for example rates for the period November 2009 to October 2011 ranged from just 39% for males living in the most deprived areas to 67% for least deprived females. Recent research has shown that asking people to consider the emotional consequences of not participating in screening (anticipated regret) can lead to a significant increase in screening uptake. Methods/Design: We will test a simple anticipated regret manipulation, in a large randomised controlled trial with 60,000 members of the general public. They will be randomly allocated to one of 3 arms, no questionnaire, control questionnaire or anticipated regret questionnaire. The primary outcome will be screening test kit return. Results will also be examined by demographic variables (age, gender, deprivation) as these are currently related to screening kit return. Discussion: If this anticipated regret intervention leads to a significant increase in colorectal cancer screening kit returns, this would represent a rare example of a theoretically-driven, simple intervention that could result in earlier detection of colorectal cancer and many more lives saved. Trial registration: Current Controlled trials: ISRCTN74986452en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_UK
dc.relationO'Carroll R, Steele R, Libby G, Brownlee L & Chambers J (2013) Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Scotland (ARTICS): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial, BMC Public Health, 13, Art. No.: 849. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-849.en_UK
dc.rights© 2013 O’Carroll et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.subjectColorectal canceren_UK
dc.subjectScreeningen_UK
dc.subjectAnticipated regreten_UK
dc.subjectHealth locus of controlen_UK
dc.subject‘Ick’ factoren_UK
dc.titleAnticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Scotland (ARTICS): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trialen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-13-849en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid24041309en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1471-2458en_UK
dc.citation.volume13en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailronan.ocarroll@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Taysideen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isi000324619600001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84883756583en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid674326en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
dc.date.firstcompliantdepositdate2014-01-08en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
O'Carroll et al. BMC Public Health 2013.pdfFulltext - Published Version261.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.