Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/18172
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBerrill, Iain-
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorMacIntyre, Craig-
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Tim-
dc.contributor.authorKnowles, Toby G-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Emma K M-
dc.contributor.authorTurnbull, James-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-20T01:17:40Z-
dc.date.issued2012-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/18172-
dc.description.abstractThe welfare of farmed fish has attracted attention in recent years, which has resulted in notable changes within the aquaculture industry. However, a lack of communication between stakeholders and opposing ethical views are perceived as barriers to achieving consensus on how to improve farmed fish welfare. To address these issues, we developed an interactive approach that could be used during stakeholder meetings to (1) improve communication between different stakeholder groups, (2) build consensus on priorities for farmed fish welfare and (3) establish mechanisms to address welfare priorities. We then applied this approach during a meeting of stakeholders to identify current and future priorities for farmed fish welfare in the UK. During the meeting in the UK, stakeholders initially identified 32 areas that they felt were in need of development for future improvements in farmed fish welfare. These were further refined via peer review and discussion to the seven most important "priority" areas. Establishing a "better understanding of what good fish welfare is" emerged as the highest priority area for farmed fish welfare. The second highest priority area was "the need for welfare monitoring and documentation systems", with mortality recording proposed as an example. The other five priority areas were "[improved understanding of] the role of genetic selection in producing fish suited to the farming environment", "a need for integration and application of behavioural and physiological measures", "the need for a more liberal regime in Europe for introducing new medicines", "a need to address the issues of training existing and new workers within the industry", and "ensuring best practise in aquaculture is followed by individual businesses". Feedback from attendees, and the meeting outputs, indicated that the approach had been successful in improving communication between stakeholders and in achieving consensus on the priorities for farmed fish welfare. The approach therefore proved highly beneficial for future improvements in fish welfare in the UK.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relationBerrill I, Cooper T, MacIntyre C, Ellis T, Knowles TG, Jones EKM & Turnbull J (2012) Achieving consensus on current and future priorities for farmed fish welfare: a case study from the UK, Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 38 (1), pp. 219-229.-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subjectFishen_UK
dc.subjectWelfareen_UK
dc.subjectStakeholderen_UK
dc.subjectAquacultureen_UK
dc.subjectConsensusen_UK
dc.subjectUKen_UK
dc.titleAchieving consensus on current and future priorities for farmed fish welfare: a case study from the UKen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10695-010-9399-2-
dc.identifier.pmid20407821-
dc.citation.jtitleFish Physiology and Biochemistry-
dc.citation.issn0920-1742-
dc.citation.volume38-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.spage219-
dc.citation.epage229-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.author.emailj.f.turnbull@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationAquaculture-
dc.contributor.affiliationDEFRA Innovation Centre-
dc.contributor.affiliationAquaculture-
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS)-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bristol-
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)-
dc.contributor.affiliationAquaculture-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
dc.identifier.isi000304115700014-
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art%3A10.1007%2Fs10695-010-9399-2.pdf303.67 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.