Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1812
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMai, Monica Giacomettien_UK
dc.contributor.authorEngrola, Sofiaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMorais, Sofiaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPortella, Maria Celiaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVerani, Jose Robertoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDinis, Maria Teresaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorConceicao, Luis E Cen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-09T07:06:09Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-09T07:06:09Z-
dc.date.issued2009-11-16en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/1812-
dc.description.abstractThe present study intended to evaluate the effects of early introduction of inert diet in lipid digestibility and metabolism of sole, while larval feed intake, growth and survival were also monitored. Solea senegalensis larvae were reared on a standard live feed regime (ST) and co-feeding regime with inert diet (Art R). Trials using sole larvae fed with Artemia enriched with two different lipid emulsions, containing glycerol tri [1-14C] oleate (TAG) and L-3-phosphatidylcholine-1,2-di-[1-14C] oleoyl (PL), were performed at 9 and 17 days after hatching (DAH) to study lipid utilization. Co-feeding did not affect sole survival rates (ST 59.1 ± 15.9 %; Art R 69.56 ± 9.3 %), but was reflected in significantly smaller final weight at 16 DAH (ST 0.71 ± 0.20; Art R 0.48 ± 0.14 mg). Higher feed intake was observed in sole larvae fed on Artemia enriched with labeled PL at 9 DAH but not at 17 DAH. At 17 DAH, the smaller larvae (Art R treatment) ingested proportionally more Artemia in weight percentage, independently of enrichment. At 9 DAH lipid digestibility was equal among treatments and higher than 90%, while at 17 DAH it was higher in ST treatment (around 73 %) compared to the Art R group (around 66 %). Lipid retention efficiency at 9 DAH was higher in the Art R treatment, reaching values of 50 %, while these values almost duplicated at 17 DAH, ranging up to 80 % in both treatments without significant differences. These results show that co-feeding of live feed and inert diet from first-feeding in Senegalese sole has a toll in terms of growth and lipid digestibility but does not seem to compromise lipid metabolic utilization.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationMai MG, Engrola S, Morais S, Portella MC, Verani JR, Dinis MT & Conceicao LEC (2009) Co-feeding of live feed and inert diet from first-feeding affects Artemia lipid digestibility and retention in Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) larvae. Aquaculture, 296 (3-4), pp. 284-291. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00448486; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.08.024en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Aquaculture by Elsevier.en_UK
dc.subjectSolea senegalensisen_UK
dc.subjectWeaningen_UK
dc.subjectLipid metabolismen_UK
dc.subjectDigestibilityen_UK
dc.subjectFeed Intakeen_UK
dc.subjectMetamorphosisen_UK
dc.subjectFishes Feeding and feedsen_UK
dc.subjectFishes Nutritionen_UK
dc.titleCo-feeding of live feed and inert diet from first-feeding affects Artemia lipid digestibility and retention in Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) larvaeen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.08.024en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAquacultureen_UK
dc.citation.issn0044-8486en_UK
dc.citation.volume296en_UK
dc.citation.issue3-4en_UK
dc.citation.spage284en_UK
dc.citation.epage291en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00448486en_UK
dc.author.emailsofia.morais@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Algarveen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Algarveen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFederal University of Sao Pauloen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFederal University of Sao Carlosen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Algarveen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Algarveen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000271139400014en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-77949773764en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid837825en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2009-11-16en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2009-11-20en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMai, Monica Giacometti|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEngrola, Sofia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMorais, Sofia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPortella, Maria Celia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVerani, Jose Roberto|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDinis, Maria Teresa|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorConceicao, Luis E C|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2009-11-20en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2009-11-20|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMai et al 2009 (Published in Aquaculture 296).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0044-8486en_UK
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mai et al 2009 (Published in Aquaculture 296).pdfFulltext - Accepted Version257.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.