Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/17851
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Neely, Sarah | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Blain, Neil | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hutcheson, Linda | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-12-20T09:29:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-12-20T09:29:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-10 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/17851 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study utilises a variety of research methods in order to investigate aspects often overlooked within Scottish film criticism, and indeed film studies more generally, namely: pre-production, production experiences, marketing and distribution, and reception. To date, Scottish film criticism has exhibited a preoccupation with questions of nation, national identity and national cinema, and overwhelmingly scholars have privileged almost exclusive analysis of the film text. Spurred by Jonathan Murray’s (2007, 2011, 2012) questioning of the continued relevance of the national framework, this thesis goes beyond the frame of the film text in order to consider new ways in which a national framework might be of relevance when analysing Scotland’s cinematic output. Concurrently, the chosen case study is also used as a means of critiquing existing literature on collective identity and national cinema. As the title of this thesis suggests, analysis centres on the Dogma-inspired Advance Party initiative and its resulting films, Red Road (Arnold, 2006) and Donkeys (McKinnon, 2010). Devised by Glasgow-based Sigma Films and Denmark’s Zentropa, the cross border collaborative dimension of the Advance Party framework initially appears to challenge the appropriateness of the national framework. As this thesis demonstrates however, such a simplistic conclusion is reductive and overlooks the complexities of the film industry. Throughout this thesis, questions as to the intended and eventual function of the Advance Party framework arise, and these are revisited by means of the thesis Conclusion. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | University of Stirling | en_GB |
dc.subject | Scottish cinema | en_GB |
dc.subject | British cinema | en_GB |
dc.subject | production studies | en_GB |
dc.subject | film marketing | en_GB |
dc.subject | film finance | en_GB |
dc.subject | film reception | en_GB |
dc.subject | production experiences | en_GB |
dc.subject | Red Road | en_GB |
dc.subject | Donkeys | en_GB |
dc.subject | Advance Party | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Motion pictures Scotland | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Motion picture industry Scotland | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Film critisism Scotland | en_GB |
dc.title | Beyond the Frame: A Critical Production Case Study of the Advance Party Initiative | en_GB |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationname | Doctor of Philosophy | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2018-12-19 | - |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Delay requested to allow time to publish. | en_GB |
dc.author.email | linda.hutcheson@gmail.com | en_GB |
dc.contributor.affiliation | School of Arts and Humanities | en_GB |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Department of Film and Media Studies | en_GB |
Appears in Collections: | Communications, Media and Culture eTheses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Linda Hutcheson PhD thesis.pdf | 27.9 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.