Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Frameworks for risk communication and disease management: The case of Lyme disease and countryside users
Author(s): Quine, Christopher P
Barnett, Julie
Dobson, Andrew
Marcu, Afrodita
Marzano, Mariella
Moseley, Darren
O'Brien, Liz
Randolph, Sarah E
Taylor, Jennifer L
Uzzell, David
Contact Email:
Keywords: outdoor recreation
influencing behaviour
risk perception
Lyme borreliosis
Issue Date: May-2011
Date Deposited: 12-Nov-2013
Citation: Quine CP, Barnett J, Dobson A, Marcu A, Marzano M, Moseley D, O'Brien L, Randolph SE, Taylor JL & Uzzell D (2011) Frameworks for risk communication and disease management: The case of Lyme disease and countryside users. Philosophical Transactions B: Biological Sciences, 366 (1573), pp. 2010-2022.
Abstract: Management of zoonotic disease is necessary if countryside users are to gain benefit rather than suffer harm from their activities, and to avoid disproportionate reaction to novel threats. We introduce a conceptual framework based on the pressure-state-response model with five broad responses to disease incidence. Influencing public behaviour is one response and requires risk communication based on an integration of knowledge about the disease with an understanding of how publics respond to precautionary advice. A second framework emphasizes how risk communication involves more than information provision and should address dimensions including points-of-intervention over time, place and audience. The frameworks are developed by reference to tick-borne Lyme borreliosis (also known as Lyme disease), for which informed precautionary behaviour is particularly relevant. Interventions to influence behaviour can be directed by knowledge of spatial and temporal variation of tick abundance, what constitutes risky behaviour, how people respond to information of varying content, and an understanding of the social practices related to countryside use. The frameworks clarify the response options and help identify who is responsible for risk communication. These aspects are not consistently understood, and may result in an underestimation of the role of land-based organizations in facilitating appropriate precautionary behaviour.
DOI Link: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0397
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Frameworks for risk communication and disease management....pdfFulltext - Published Version284.67 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.