Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/16964
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Susanaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCasanova, Catarina C Nen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Claudiaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Phyllis Cen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-24T21:17:54Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-24T21:17:54Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03en_UK
dc.identifier.other110en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/16964-
dc.description.abstractLabels attributed to different species - ‘good' or ‘bad' - can provide clues about the underlying attitudes that may determine values applied to nonhumans. Understanding such values can guide community conservation approaches, such as assessing which animals might act as flagship species (biophilic), which are thought to be of use (utilitarian), or which are viewed with hostility (authoritarian). This paper considers how people from Cantanhez National Park (Tombali, Guinea-Bissau) perceive nonhumans in order to assess whether sociozoologic scales can access people's perceptions of biodiversity. We focus on chimpanzees as a potential flagship species for promoting forest conservation. Three hypotheses were considered: (i) A correlation between positive attitudes and edibility was expected for most species, except for chimpanzees that hold attributes other than those of utility; (ii) Chimpanzees were expected to be perceived as ‘similar to humans', which should produce positive perceptions; (iii) Perceptions reflect gender and religious differences. Women who encounter chimpanzees as crop-raiders will dislike and fear chimpanzees more than men while religion was expected to influence the degree of anthropocentrism. A survey of 257 villagers was conducted between February and March 2007. Photos of Guinean animals and one of a non-Guinean control species (N=27) were shown to subjects who were asked to apply adjectives such as ‘good', ‘bad', ‘edible', ‘inedible', ‘pretty', ‘ugly', among others, and then to rank the top three animals that most strongly represented each adjective. Descriptive statistical and principal component analyses were applied to these rankings. With the exception of some religious beliefs that protect chimpanzees from bushmeat exploitation - contributing to their inedibility - people perceived them as ugly and bad. Chimpanzees human resemblance has protected them from hunting pressure, but their tendency to raid the farms makes them vulnerable to the villagers' hostility. Authorities need to consider if chimpanzees are a good flagship, since attitudes towards this species were ambivalent.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOMICS Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationCosta S, Casanova CCN, Sousa C & Lee PC (2013) The good, the bad and the ugly: perceptions of wildlife in Tombali (Guinea-Bissau, West Africa). Journal of Primatology, 2 (1), Art. No.: 110.en_UK
dc.rights© 2013 Costa S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_UK
dc.subjectWildlife perceptionsen_UK
dc.subjectAttitudes to animalsen_UK
dc.subjectGuinean faunaen_UK
dc.subjectChimpanzeeen_UK
dc.subjectHuman-animal communicationen_UK
dc.subjectHuman-animal relationshipsen_UK
dc.subjectWildlife conservationen_UK
dc.subjectChimpanzeesen_UK
dc.titleThe good, the bad and the ugly: perceptions of wildlife in Tombali (Guinea-Bissau, West Africa)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Primatologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn2167-6801en_UK
dc.citation.volume2en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailphyllis.lee@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade Técnica de Lisboa, Portugalen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Lisbonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid675914en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4296-3513en_UK
dc.date.accepted2013-03-18en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-03-18en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-10-07en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCosta, Susana|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCasanova, Catarina C N|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSousa, Claudia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLee, Phyllis C|0000-0002-4296-3513en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2013-10-07en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/|2013-10-07|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameCosta et al Jprimatol 2013.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2167-6801en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Costa et al Jprimatol 2013.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.