Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/16673
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCresswell, Willen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLind, Johanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, John Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorMinderman, Jeroenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWhitfield, D Philipen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-21T23:13:43Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-21T23:13:43Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2007-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/16673-
dc.description.abstractThe use of metal and colour-rings or bands as a means of measuring survival, movements and behaviour in birds is universal and fundamental to testing ecological and evolutionary theories. The practice rests on the largely untested assumption that the rings do not affect survival. However this assumption may not hold for several reasons, for example because the ‘oddity effect’ predicts predators select prey that appear different to their neighbours in order to avoid the ‘confusion effect’. We compared the foraging behaviour and the death rates of redshanksTringa totanusconspicuously marked with six colour rings and one metal ring each to unmarked birds in a study system, where routinely up to 50% of the total population are killed by avian predators during a winter. If avian predators selectively target and/or have a higher capture success of ringed birds then we would predict the proportion of colour-ringed birds in the population to decline through a winter. The proportion of colour-ringed birds in the population did not change over the course of three separate winters, and in one winter the ratio of marked:unmarked birds found killed by sparrowhawksAccipiter nisuswas the same as the ratio of marked birds alive in the population. In the year with largest sample size, power was sufficient to detect a greater than 2.2% difference in predation rate between ringed and unringed groups. The average kill rate difference between ringed and unringed birds across the three winters was less than 1% (0.73±2.2%) suggesting that even if there were differences in predation rate that were not detected because of low statistical power they were extremely small. There were no differences in any foraging measures comparing ringed and unringed birds, suggesting that the rings did not affect the ability of birds to meet their daily energy budgets. The results showed that colour-ringed birds were not preferentially targeted or killed by avian predators, and suggest that the presence of a metal and even several large colour-rings is unlikely to affect behaviour and predation mortality even under extreme selection.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationCresswell W, Lind J, Quinn JL, Minderman J & Whitfield DP (2007) Ringing or colour-banding does not increase predation mortality in redshanks Tringa totanus. Journal of Avian Biology, 38 (3), pp. 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.03925.xen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleRinging or colour-banding does not increase predation mortality in redshanks Tringa totanusen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Cresswelletal_JAB.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.03925.xen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Avian Biologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1600-048Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn0908-8857en_UK
dc.citation.volume38en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage309en_UK
dc.citation.epage316en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailjeroen.minderman1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNatural Research Ltden_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000247312100010en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-34247867942en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid678674en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8451-5540en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2007-05-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-09-19en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCresswell, Will|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLind, Johan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorQuinn, John L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMinderman, Jeroen|0000-0002-8451-5540en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWhitfield, D Philip|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameCresswelletal_JAB.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0908-8857en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cresswelletal_JAB.pdfFulltext - Published Version188.75 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.