Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMilner, Victoria Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGilvear, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorWillby, Nigelen_UK
dc.description.abstractRiver classification is a useful tool for researchers and managers wishing to organise, to simplify and to understand the forms and processes within freshwater systems. Many classifications require surveyors to classify reaches into specific channel types in a field environment. Channel types should be identifiable on the basis of a field surveyor's judgement of channel characteristics and landscape settings; these include channel planform, valley confinement, dominant bed material and/or instream geomorphic features (e.g. gravel bars). An accurate classification of reaches into the correct channel type is important to ensure consistency in management strategies and to assess the impact of engineering activities on the physical and ecological status of rivers. In this article, we examine the variation in professional judgement of geomorphologically based channel types by scientists with different disciplinary backgrounds and varying levels of involvement in classification systems using a photo-questionnaire. Results indicate that there can be a large level of discrepancy in typing rivers; the choice of the modal channel type for each reach varied between 25.9% and 75.1% of the respondent selections. There were also differences in the level of agreement between earth scientists (with hydrogeomorphological or geological training), ecological scientists (with freshwater biology training) and practitioners involved in river conservation and management. A high level of experience in classification systems translates to a lower number of channel types being chosen per reach. In response to these results, the use of a photographic approach to typing needs to be fully tested and users fully trained before operational use. Furthermore, we advocate that designers of geomorphic typologies should aim to have a representative and workable number of classes within a typology with an emphasis for rationalisation of classes rather than expansion of numbers.en_UK
dc.relationMilner VS, Gilvear D & Willby N (2013) An assessment of variants in the professional judgement of geomorphologically based channel types. River Research and Applications, 29 (2), pp. 236-249.
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.subjectchannel typeen_UK
dc.subjectprofessional judgementen_UK
dc.subjectriver classificationsen_UK
dc.subjectriver typologiesen_UK
dc.subjectchannel morphologyen_UK
dc.titleAn assessment of variants in the professional judgement of geomorphologically based channel typesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[An assessment of variants in the professional judgement of geomorphologically based ch.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleRiver Research and Applicationsen_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderScottish Environment Protection Agencyen_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Worcesteren_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectBlue Skies PhD Support V Milner Geomorphological & biological validation of river typingen_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMilner, Victoria S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGilvear, David|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWillby, Nigel|0000-0002-1020-0933en_UK
local.rioxx.projectNER/S/A/2006/14226|Natural Environment Research Council|
local.rioxx.projectNER/S/A/2006/14226|Scottish Environment Protection Agency|
local.rioxx.filenameAn assessment of variants in the professional judgement of geomorphologically based ch.pdfen_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
An assessment of variants in the professional judgement of geomorphologically based ch.pdfFulltext - Published Version631.09 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-29    Request a copy

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.