Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15767
Appears in Collections:Computing Science and Mathematics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: A survey of search methodologies and automated system development for examination timetabling
Author(s): Qu, Rong
Burke, Edmund
McCollum, Barry
Merlot, Liam T G
Lee, Sau Yan
Contact Email: e.k.burke@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Examination timetabling
Benchmark problem datasets
Search methodologies
Issue Date: Feb-2009
Date Deposited: 3-Jul-2013
Citation: Qu R, Burke E, McCollum B, Merlot LTG & Lee SY (2009) A survey of search methodologies and automated system development for examination timetabling. Journal of Scheduling, 12 (1), pp. 55-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-008-0077-5
Abstract: Examination timetabling is one of the most important administrative activities that takes place in all academic institutions. In this paper, we present a critical discussion of the research on exam timetabling which has taken place in the last decade or so. This last ten years has seen a significantly increased level of research attention for this important area. There has been a range of insightful contributions to the scientific literature both in terms of theoretical issues and practical aspects. The main aim of this survey is to highlight the new trends and key research achievements that have been carried out in the last decade. We also aim to outline a range of relevant important research issues and challenges that have been generated by this body of work. We first define the problem and discuss previous survey papers. Within our presentation of the state-of-the-art methodologies, we highlight recent research trends including hybridisations of search methodologies and the development of techniques which are motivated by raising the level of generality at which search methodologies can operate. Summarising tables are presented to provide an overall view of these techniques. We also present and discuss some important issues which have come to light concerning the public benchmark exam timetabling data. Different versions of problem datasets with the same name have been circulating in the scientific community for the last ten years and this has generated a significant amount of confusion. We clarify the situation and present a re-naming of the widely studied datasets to avoid future confusion. We also highlight which research papers have dealt with which dataset. Finally, we draw upon our discussion of the literature to present a (non-exhaustive) range of potential future research directions and open issues in exam timetabling research.
DOI Link: 10.1007/s10951-008-0077-5
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s): http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A survey of search methodologies and automated system development for examination timetabling.pdfFulltext - Published Version637.25 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-29    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.