Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15718
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAtkin, Jason A Den_UK
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Edmunden_UK
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, John Sen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-10T03:17:51Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-10T03:17:51Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2011-10en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/15718-
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes recent research into the departure process at London Heathrow, with the primary motivation of reducing the amount of fuel used, improving both the economic and environmental costs. Two proposals are considered here. The first proposal considers the practicality and potential benefits of aiding the controller in improving the take-off sequencing. The second proposal aims to absorb some of the inevitable delay for aircraft at the stands, before the engines are started, but also involves a take-off sequencing aspect. Models for the two take-off sequencing problems are presented in this paper, the second of which includes an additional pushback time (or TSAT) allocation sub-problem which has to be solved subsequently. These models have distinctive differences from the models for the take-off and arrival sequencing problems which are usually considered in the literature, since they take into account necessary constraints imposed due to the control problem (whether a sequence can actually be achieved, and how) in each case. As discussed in this paper, the control problem cannot be ignored by the controllers at Heathrow, and so it cannot be ignored by any realistic system to aid them in their tasks. Comparative take-off sequencing results are presented for the two systems, and the potential benefits from providing decision support to the runway controllers or improved TSAT allocation at the stands are considered. The paper ends with some overall conclusions from the research, showing the large potential benefits of these systems. The TSAT allocation system which is discussed in this paper has been developed for implementation at London Heathrow as one element of a major project which focuses upon collaborative decision making.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringeren_UK
dc.relationAtkin JAD, Burke E & Greenwood JS (2011) A comparison of two methods for reducing take-off delay at London Heathrow airport. Journal of Scheduling, 14 (5), pp. 409-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-011-0228-yen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectRunway schedulingen_UK
dc.subjectAirport operationsen_UK
dc.subjectAirport optimisationen_UK
dc.subjectStand holdingen_UK
dc.subjectTSATen_UK
dc.subjectAirports Managementen_UK
dc.subjectAirports Great Britain Planningen_UK
dc.titleA comparison of two methods for reducing take-off delay at London Heathrow airporten_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[A comparison of two methods.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10951-011-0228-yen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Schedulingen_UK
dc.citation.issn1099-1425en_UK
dc.citation.issn1094-6136en_UK
dc.citation.volume14en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.spage409en_UK
dc.citation.epage421en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaile.k.burke@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationComputing Science and Mathematics - Divisionen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNATS (National Air Traffic Services Ltd)en_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000294354800002en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-81155137838en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid695621en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-10-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-07-01en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAtkin, Jason A D|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBurke, Edmund|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGreenwood, John S|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameA comparison of two methods.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1094-6136en_UK
Appears in Collections:Computing Science and Mathematics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A comparison of two methods.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.03 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.