Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/13049
Appears in Collections: | Economics Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Unrefereed |
Title: | Assessing relative spending needs of devolved government: the case of healthcare spending in the UK |
Author(s): | Ball, Robert Eiser, David King, David N |
Contact Email: | david.eiser@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | Barnett formula Healthcare spending Devolution Intergovernmental grant H51 H73 I10 R50 |
Issue Date: | 2015 |
Date Deposited: | 23-May-2013 |
Citation: | Ball R, Eiser D & King DN (2015) Assessing relative spending needs of devolved government: the case of healthcare spending in the UK. Regional Studies, 49 (2), pp. 323-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.779660 |
Abstract: | The system used to allocate resources to the UK's devolved territories, known as the Barnett formula, takes no account of the relative expenditure needs of the territories. In this paper we investigate the prospects of developing a needs based model for allocating healthcare resources to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. We compare the method used by the National Health Service in England to allocate resources geographically within England with the method used by the NHS in Scotland to allocate resources to territorial Health Boards. By applying both approaches to the UK's devolved territories, we are able to examine similarities and differences in the two methods, and explore implications for an assessment of the relative healthcare expenditure need of each territory. The implications for the way in which revenue is distributed to Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are discussed. |
DOI Link: | 10.1080/00343404.2013.779660 |
Rights: | This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published 01 May 2013 in Regional Studies copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00343404.2013.779660 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Health paper 3-9-12 website version.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 211.97 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.