|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigens in the faeces with the urea breath test|
Williams, Craig L
Doherty, Conor P
Mccoll, Kenneth E L
Weaver, Lawrence T
urea breath test
|Citation:||Shepherd A, Williams CL, Doherty CP, Hossack M, Preston T, Mccoll KEL & Weaver LT (2000) Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigens in the faeces with the urea breath test. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 83 (3), pp. 268-270. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.83.3.268|
|Abstract:||BACKGROUND: Current diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori are invasive (endoscopy) or indirect (urea breath test, serology).AIMS: To evaluate a new enzyme immunoassay (EIA) which detects H pyloriantigens in faeces, by comparing its sensitivity and specificity in children with the 13C urea breath test (UBT).METHODS: A total of 119 children underwent a UBT and provided a faecal sample for antigen testing within seven days. After an overnight fast each child provided a pretest breath sample, and samples at 30 and 40 minutes after ingestion of 100 mg 13C labelled urea. 13C enrichment of breath was measured by isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Faeces were stored at -70°C until antigen testing, using the EIA. Samples were read spectrophotometrically at 450 nm and results were interpreted using recommended cut offs of optical density less than 0.14 as negative, ⩾0.16 as positive, with ⩾0.14 and less than 0.16 representing equivocal results. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the manufacturer's cut off compared with UBT.RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 82%, respectively. Negative and positive predictive values were 97% and 58%.CONCLUSIONS: The EIA is an alternative, non-invasive, and easy to use method for the detection ofH pylori in children. Its high negative predictive value suggests a role in screening out uninfected children.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Shepherd_2000_Comparison_of_an_enzyme_immunoassay.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||211.18 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.