Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTovee, Martin Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHancock, Peter J Ben_UK
dc.contributor.authorMahmoodi, Sasanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSingleton, Ben R Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorCornelissen, Piers Len_UK
dc.description.abstractTwo putative cues to female physical attractiveness are Body Mass Index (BMI) and shape (particularly the Waist-Hip Ratio or WHR). To determine the relative importance of these cues we asked 23 male and 23 female undergraduates to rate a set of 60 pictures of real women’s bodies in front-view for attractiveness. In our set of images, the relative ranges of BMI and WHR favoured WHR. We based these ranges on a sample of 457 women. We did not limit the WHR range, although we kept the BMI range to 0.5 s.d. either side of the sample means. As a result, WHR averaged 1.65 s.d. either side of its sample mean. However, even with these advantages, WHR was less important than BMI as a predictor of attractiveness ratings for bodies. BMI is far more strongly correlated with ratings of attractiveness than WHR (BMI ~ 0.5, WHR ~ 0.2). To further explore the relative importance of BMI and WHR, we deliberately chose a sub-set of these images that demonstrated an inverse correlation of BMI and WHR (i.e. a group in which as images get heavier they also become more curvaceous). If WHR is the most important determinant of attractiveness, then the more curvaceous (but higher BMI) images should be judged most attractive. However, if BMI is a better predictor, then the opposite should be true. We found that the more curvaceous (but higher BMI) images were judged least attractive, thereby inverting the expected rating pattern. This strongly suggests that viewers’ judgements were influenced more by BMI than WHR. Finally, it is possible that body shape is an important cue to attractiveness, but that simple ratios (such as WHR) are not adequately capturing it. So we treated the outline of the torso as a waveform and carried out a set of three waveform analyses on it to allow us to quantify body shape and correlate it against attractiveness. The waveform analyses address the complexity of the whole torso shape, and pull out innate properties of the torso shape and not shape elements based on prior decisions about arbitrary physical features. Our analyses decompose the waveform into objective quantified elements whose importance in predicting attractiveness can then be tested. All of the components that were good descriptors of body shape were weakly correlated with attractiveness. Our results suggest that BMI is a stronger predictor of attractiveness than WHR.en_UK
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Londonen_UK
dc.relationTovee MJ, Hancock PJB, Mahmoodi S, Singleton BRR & Cornelissen PL (2002) Human female attractiveness: waveform analysis of body shape.. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269 (1506), pp. 2205-2213.
dc.rightsPublished in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. Copyright 2002 by the Royal Societyen_UK
dc.subjectFemale Physical Attractivenessen_UK
dc.subjectBody Mass Indexen_UK
dc.subjectWaist-Hip Ratioen_UK
dc.subjectBody Shapeen_UK
dc.subjectBody mass indexen_UK
dc.subjectSexual attractiveness Psychological aspectsen_UK
dc.subjectBody, Human Composition Measurementen_UK
dc.titleHuman female attractiveness: waveform analysis of body shapeen_UK
dc.typeConference Paperen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciencesen_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
rioxxterms.typeConference Paper/Proceeding/Abstracten_UK
local.rioxx.authorTovee, Martin J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHancock, Peter J B|0000-0001-6025-7068en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMahmoodi, Sasan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSingleton, Ben R R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCornelissen, Piers L|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hancock-prsb-2002.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version842.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.