Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Unrefereed
Title: Revisiting the surveillance camera revolution: Issues of governance and public policy. Introduction to Part one of the special issue
Author(s): Webster, C William R
Topfer, Eric
Klauser, Francisco R
Raab, Charles D
Contact Email:
Issue Date: 2011
Date Deposited: 19-Apr-2013
Citation: Webster CWR, Topfer E, Klauser FR & Raab CD (2011) Revisiting the surveillance camera revolution: Issues of governance and public policy. Introduction to Part one of the special issue (Editorial). Information Polity, 16 (4), pp. 297-301.
Abstract: First paragraph: Video surveillance cameras and systems - commonly referred to as Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) - are a defining feature of modern society. Their widespread use, as fixed or mobile devices, deployed for a range of purposes and by a variety of public and private actors, is now unsurprising and generally accepted in most countries. The normality of these surveillance practices, and the technologies used, are a world away from the early tube cameras used for local broadcasting and the isolated monitoring of industrial processing in the 1930s and 1940s. The diffusion processes, which have led to the exponential growth of these cameras and systems, have included evolutions in the design, function and capabilities of systems, especially around opportunities for extended, combined and automated systems offered by new information and communication technologies. These technologies have been shaped by a raft of interested parties, including engineers, manufacturers, clients/service users, politicians and regulators. The changing and contested terminology used to denote and describe the socio-technical practices around these systems illustrates both the variety of applications and their wider social and political context. 'Video surveillance', 'video observation', 'video protection' and 'visual surveillance' share the semantic reference to viewing and imply monitoring rooted in the technological practices of optoelectronics, but they convey different meanings about the benefits and uses of technology. In the same way, terms like 'spy cameras', 'big brother cameras', 'security cameras' and 'public safety cameras' convey different meanings and different perceived 'impacts'. An example of the political significance of language and terminology is provided by the French Government, which decided to replace the term 'video surveillance' with 'video protection' in all legal texts and regulations in an attempt to influence the perceived societal 'meaning' of these systems (see Heilmann in this Special Issue).
DOI Link: 10.3233/IP-2011-0262
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Notes: Output Type: Editorial
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Webster et al 2011 Revisiting the surveillance camera revolution.pdfFulltext - Published Version91.11 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-12-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.