Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeattie, Vivien-
dc.contributor.authorGoodacre, Alan-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Sarah Jane-
dc.description.abstractDespite theoretical developments in recent years, our understanding of corporate capital structure remains incomplete. Prior empirical research has been dominated by archival regression studies which are limited in their ability to fully reflect the diversity found in practice. The present paper reports on a comprehensive survey of corporate financing decision-making in 192 UK listed companies. A key finding is that firms are heterogeneous in their capital structure policies. About half of the firms seek to maintain a target debt level, consistent with trade-off theory, but 60% claim to follow a financing hierarchy, consistent with pecking order theory. These two theories are not viewed by respondents as either mutually exclusive or exhaustive, since some firms adopt (at least partially) both strategies, while a significant number of firms do not appear to follow either of these strategies. Such observations raise concerns about the usefulness of large-scale regression modelling of capital structure determinants. In normal usage, these models can only describe whether a particular theory is consistent with the observed capital structure of the 'average firm' in the population. They are not typically used to model the diversity of capital structure practice. As found in many regression-based determinant studies, there is clear evidence here that company size affects corporate financing decisions. For example, large companies are more likely to adopt a target debt level and to maintain financial slack (though not more likely to follow a hierarchy of finance). Similarly, current high levels of gearing encourage a greater focus on particular issues, such as projected cash flows, loan covenants and non-interest tax shields. This contingency on debt levels suggests that empirical studies of capital structure dynamics may be particularly fruitful. Investigation of debt level determinants shows that many of the theoretical arguments are widely accepted by respondents, in particular the importance of interest tax shield, financial distress, agency costs and also, at least implicitly, information asymmetry.en_UK
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirling-
dc.relationBeattie V, Goodacre A & Smith SJ (2004) Diversity and Determinants of Corporate Financing Decisions: Survey Evidence. University of Stirling, Department of Accounting, Finance & Law Working Paper. University of Stirling.-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUniversity of Stirling, Department of Accounting, Finance & Law Working Paper-
dc.subjectCapital structureen_UK
dc.subjecttrade-off theoryen_UK
dc.subjectpecking order theoryen_UK
dc.titleDiversity and Determinants of Corporate Financing Decisions: Survey Evidenceen_UK
dc.typeWorking or Discussion Paperen_UK
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgow-
dc.contributor.affiliationAccounting and Finance-
dc.contributor.affiliationAccounting and Finance-
Appears in Collections:Accounting and Finance Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Goodacre_2004_WP_Diversity_and_Determinants_of_Corporate_Financing_Decisions.pdf339.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.