|Appears in Collections:||Accounting and Finance Working Papers|
|Title:||Publication Records of Faculty Promoted to Professor: Evidence from the UK Accounting and Finance Academic Community|
|Citation:||Beattie V & Goodacre A (2010) Publication Records of Faculty Promoted to Professor: Evidence from the UK Accounting and Finance Academic Community. University of Stirling, Department of Accounting, Finance & Law, Working Paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1639882|
|JEL Code(s):||M40: Accounting and Auditing: General|
M49: Accounting: Other
|Publisher:||University of Stirling|
|Series/Report no.:||University of Stirling, Department of Accounting, Finance & Law, Working Paper|
|Abstract:||This study investigates the publication profiles of 140 accounting and finance faculty promoted to the senior rank of professor at UK and Irish universities during the period 1992 to 2007. On average, approximately 9 papers in Association of Business Schools (ABS) (2008)-listed journals, with 5 at the highest 3*/4* quality levels in a portfolio of 20 outputs are required for promotion to professor. Multivariate analysis provides evidence that publication requirements in terms of ABS ranked journal papers have increased over time, an effect attributed to the government research assessment exercise. There is no evidence that requirements differ for: internal versus external promotion, male versus female candidates; accounting versus finance professors, research intensity of institution peer group; or government research ranking of unit. There is also no evidence of a substitution effect in relation to increased recent publication history, quantity of non-ABS outputs or sole-authorship, all of which show a significant complementary effect. It is noted that there is very limited overlap in the UK and US publication journal sets, suggesting underlying geographically-based paradigm differences. The benchmarks provided in this study are informative in a range of decision settings: recruitment; those considering making an application for promotion to a chair and those involved in promotion panels; cross-disciplinary comparisons; and resource allocation. The evidence presented also contributes to the emerging policy debates concerning the aging demographic profile of accounting faculty, the management of academic labour and the Research Excellence Framework.|
|Affiliation:||University of Glasgow|
Accounting & Finance
|Goodacre_2010_WP_Publication_Records_of_Faculty.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||273.16 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.