Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/10895
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVakirtzis, Antoniosen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Craigen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-11T23:09:10Z-
dc.date.available2013-02-11T23:09:10Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-30en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/10895-
dc.description.abstractIn mate choice copying, a male is more likely to be chosen by other females simply by being observed mating. A recent finding is that women are influenced in their assessments of men by the phenotypic quality of males' sexual partners. We recently proposed that the term 'mate quality bias' should be used to differentiate this phenomenon from 'mate choice copying'. Here, under the guise of a dating preferences survey we replicated and extended some earlier results. We found that when presented to female raters, men are more desirable dates when they are depicted as having had relatively attractive (versus relatively unattractive) former partners, an effect that appears to be moderated by a second variable, namely the former partner's age. We did not find evidence for this bias effect when men rate women whose profiles have been similarly manipulated. These findings suggest the operation of a sex-specific mate choice mechanism.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherFinnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Boarden_UK
dc.relationVakirtzis A & Roberts SC (2010) Mate quality bias: Sex differences in humans. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 47 (2), pp. 149-157. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.047.0208en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Annales Zoologici Fennici 47(2):149-157. 2010, by Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board. The original publication is available at doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5735/086.047.0208en_UK
dc.titleMate quality bias: Sex differences in humansen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.5735/086.047.0208en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAnnales Zoologici Fennicien_UK
dc.citation.issn0003-455Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume47en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage149en_UK
dc.citation.epage157en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailcraig.roberts@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Liverpoolen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000277250800008en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid749196en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-04-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-02-06en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorVakirtzis, Antonios|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, S Craig|0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2013-02-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2013-02-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename2010_MQB_AZF.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0003-455Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2010_MQB_AZF.pdfFulltext - Published Version233.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.