|dc.contributor.author||Roberts, S Craig||-|
|dc.description.abstract||Following two decades of research on non-human animals, there has recently been increased interest in human nonindependent mate choice, namely the ways in which choosing women incorporate information about a man's past or present romantic partners ('model females') into their own assessment of the male. Experimental studies using static facial images have generally found that men receive higher desirability ratings from female raters when presented with attractive (compared to unattractive) model females. This phenomenon has a straightforward evolutionary explanation: the fact that female mate value is more dependent on physical attractiveness compared to male mate value. Furthermore, due to assortative mating for attractiveness, men who are paired with attractive women are more likely to be of high mate value themselves. Here, we also examine the possible relevance of model female cues other than attractiveness (personality and behavioral traits) by presenting video recordings of model females to a set of female raters. The results confirm that the model female's attractiveness is the primary cue. Contrary to some earlier findings in the human and nonhuman literature, we found no evidence that female raters prefer partners of slightly older model females. We conclude by suggesting some promising variations on the present experimental design.||en_UK|
|dc.relation||Vakirtzis A & Roberts SC (2012) Human Nonindependent Mate Choice: Is Model Female Attractiveness Everything?, Evolutionary Psychology, 10 (2), pp. 225-237.||-|
|dc.rights||Publisher allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Evolutionary Psychology 10(2): 225-237. Original publication available at: http://www.epjournal.net/articles/2294/||-|
|dc.subject||Nonindependent mate choice||en_UK|
|dc.subject||mate choice copying||en_UK|
|dc.subject||mate quality bias||en_UK|
|dc.title||Human Nonindependent Mate Choice: Is Model Female Attractiveness Everything?||en_UK|
|dc.type.status||Publisher version (final published refereed version)||-|
|dc.contributor.affiliation||University of Liverpool||-|
|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.