Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/10844
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Craigen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDunbar, Robin I Men_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-07T23:06:14Z-
dc.date.available2013-02-07T23:06:14Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2000-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/10844-
dc.description.abstractIn monogamous species, females often choose between males according to the quality of the territories they defend, but the extent to which females themselves contribute to territory defence is frequently underestimated. Here we test for differences in male and female roles during paired scent-marking bouts, a key component of territorial defence, in a monogamous antelope. In two populations (Kenya, Zimbabwe) of klipspringer, Oreotragus oreotragus, both males and females usually scent-marked at the same site, but there were significant differences between sexes in terms of investment within bouts. Females initiated most bouts, thus dictating the marking strategy of the pair. Males initiated relatively few bouts, but deposited more scent marks per bout than females and were usually the last to scent-mark before leaving the site; they marked on the same branches as the female and thus overmarked her scent. Both sexes deposited more marks during paired than solo visits. Immediately preceding and following scent-marking bouts, males approached females and females left males more often than expected. Female scent-marking rates were higher when they were receptive than at other times, and this increase was matched by elevated marking rates of males. Females may increase marking rates when they are receptive in order to test the quality of their mate or to incite male competition. However, these ideas are unlikely to explain female scent-marking behaviour outside the mating season, which appears to be related primarily to territorial defence. We suggest that these differences in investment in scent-marking bouts are consistent with predictions that females may be autonomously territorial and that overmarking of female scent by males is a form of mate-guarding.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringeren_UK
dc.relationRoberts SC & Dunbar RIM (2000) Female territoriality and the function of scent-marking in a monogamous antelope (Oreotragus oreotragus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 47 (6), pp. 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050685en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectolfactionen_UK
dc.subjectklipspringeren_UK
dc.subjectterritorialityen_UK
dc.subjectstatus signalen_UK
dc.subjectmonogamyen_UK
dc.titleFemale territoriality and the function of scent-marking in a monogamous antelope (Oreotragus oreotragus)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[2000_klipspringer.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s002650050685en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1432-0762en_UK
dc.citation.issn0340-5443en_UK
dc.citation.volume47en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.spage417en_UK
dc.citation.epage423en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailcraig.roberts@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Liverpoolen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000087531600007en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid748801en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2000-05-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-02-04en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, S Craig|0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDunbar, Robin I M|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filename2000_klipspringer.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0340-5443en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2000_klipspringer.pdfFulltext - Published Version64.7 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.