Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/10573
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHynes, Stephen-
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Danny-
dc.contributor.authorHowley, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-09T10:28:13Z-
dc.date.issued2011-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/10573-
dc.description.abstractDifferent economic valuation methodologies can be used to value the non-market benefits of an agri-environmental scheme. In particular, the non-market value can be examined by assessing the public's willingness to pay for the policy outputs as a whole or by modelling the preferences of society for the component attributes of the rural landscape that result from the implementation of the policy. In this article we examine whether the welfare values estimated for an agri-environmental policy are significantly different between an holistic valuation methodology (using contingent valuation) and an attribute-based valuation methodology (choice experiment). It is argued that the valuation methodology chosen should be based on whether or not the overall objective is the valuation of the agri-environment policy package in its entirety or the valuation of each of the policy's distinct environmental outputs.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.relationHynes S, Campbell D & Howley P (2011) A holistic vs. an attribute-based approach to agri-environmental policy valuation: do welfare estimates differ?, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62 (2), pp. 305-329.-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subjectAttribute vs. holistic valuesen_UK
dc.subjectchoice experimentsen_UK
dc.subjectcontingent valuationen_UK
dc.subjectenvironmental goods and servicesen_UK
dc.subjectenvironmental policyen_UK
dc.subjectlatent class modelsen_UK
dc.subjectnon-market valuationen_UK
dc.subjectpreference heterogeneityen_UK
dc.titleA holistic vs. an attribute-based approach to agri-environmental policy valuation: do welfare estimates differ?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00287.x-
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Agricultural Economics-
dc.citation.issn0021-857X-
dc.citation.volume62-
dc.citation.issue2-
dc.citation.spage305-
dc.citation.epage329-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.author.emaildanny.campbell@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galway-
dc.contributor.affiliationEconomics-
dc.contributor.affiliationTeagasc-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hynes et al_JAgEc_2011.pdf286.09 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.