1. STORRE
  2. Stirling Management School
  3. Economics
  4. Economics Journal Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/10511
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorScarpa, Riccardoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Dannyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, W Georgeen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-18T10:36:23Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-18T10:36:23Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2007-11en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/10511-
dc.description.abstractA multi-attribute, stated-preference approach is used to value low and high impact actions on four major landscape components addressed by the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland. Several methodological issues are addressed: the use of prior beliefs on the relative magnitudes of parameters, standardized description of different levels of landscape improvements via image manipulation software, adoption of efficiency-increasing sequential experimental design, and sensitivity of benefit estimates to inclusion of responses from "irrational" respondents. Results suggest that Bayesian design updating delivers significant efficiency gains without loss in respondent efficiency, and estimates are upward-biased when irrational respondents are included.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherUniversity of Wisconsin Pressen_UK
dc.relationScarpa R, Campbell D & Hutchinson WG (2007) Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents’ rationality in a choice experiment. Land Economics, 83 (4), pp. 617-634. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27647797en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleBenefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents’ rationality in a choice experimenten_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[LE_2007.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleLand Economicsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1543-8325en_UK
dc.citation.issn0023-7639en_UK
dc.citation.volume83en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage617en_UK
dc.citation.epage634en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/27647797en_UK
dc.author.emaildanny.campbell@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Waikatoen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEconomicsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen's University Belfasten_UK
dc.identifier.wtid754154en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7467-2318en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2007-11-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-01-16en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorScarpa, Riccardo|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCampbell, Danny|0000-0001-7467-2318en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHutchinson, W George|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameLE_2007.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0023-7639en_UK
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LE_2007.pdfFulltext - Published Version582.73 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright

View License
Show simple item record


Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.