Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Accounting and Finance Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Auditor analytical review judgement: A performance evaluation
Author(s): Lin, Kenny Z
Fraser, Ian
Hatherly, David J
Contact Email:
Keywords: Auditor judgement
Analytical review
Issue Date: Mar-2003
Date Deposited: 14-Jan-2013
Citation: Lin KZ, Fraser I & Hatherly DJ (2003) Auditor analytical review judgement: A performance evaluation. British Accounting Review, 35 (1), pp. 19-34.
Abstract: This study provides experimental evidence on several important measures for evaluating the performance of auditor judgement in an analytical review (AR) context. The results of the study suggest that UK auditors demonstrated only moderate level of judgement performance, as measured by consensus, consistency, and self-insight. Contrary to what might be expected, the study did not find that auditors from larger firms exhibited relatively greater consensus. In order to identify experience effects the paper employs the 'expertise paradigm' [Accounting, Organizations and Society 18 (1993) 425]. Significant experience effects were identified implying that auditor judgement performance might be improved if less straightforward judgements were to be made by more senior auditors than is currently the case. The results of the study may have implications for both the cost structures and staffing policies of audit firms.
DOI Link: 10.1016/S0890-8389(02)00107-5
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LinFraserHatherly_BAR_2003.pdfFulltext - Published Version138.85 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.