|Appears in Collections:||Computing Science and Mathematics Conference Papers and Proceedings|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Omnibus verification policies: A flexible, configurable approach to assertion-based software verification|
|Citation:||Wilson T, Maharaj S & Clark R (2005) Omnibus verification policies: A flexible, configurable approach to assertion-based software verification In: Aichernig B & Beckert B (eds.) SEFM 2005: Third IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, Proceedings. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, Los Alamitos, CA, 07.09.2005-09.09.2005. Los Alamitos, CA: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc, pp. 150-159. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=10529.|
|Conference Name:||3rd IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods|
|Conference Dates:||2005-09-07 - 2005-09-09|
|Conference Location:||Koblenz, Germany|
|Abstract:||The three main assertion-based verification approachesare: Design by Contract (DBC), Extended Static Checking(ESC) and Verified Design by Contract (VDBC). Each approachoffers a different balance between rigour and easeof use making them appropriate in different situations. Ourgoal is to explore the use of these approaches together in aflexible way, enabling an application to be broken downinto sections with different reliability requirements and differentverification approaches used in each section. We explainthe benefits of using the approaches together, presenta set of guidelines to avoid potential conflicts and give anoverview of how the Omnibus IDE provides support for thefull range of assertion-based verification approaches withina single tool.|
|Status:||VoR - Version of Record|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|sefm-draft14.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||297.36 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 2999-12-01 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.