Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF in detecting change in quality of life following liver transplantation
Author(s): O'Carroll, Ronan
Smith, K
Couston, Margaret
Cossar, Jill
Hayes, Peter C
Contact Email:
Keywords: Effect size
Quality of Life
Issue Date: Feb-2000
Date Deposited: 5-Dec-2012
Citation: O'Carroll R, Smith K, Couston M, Cossar J & Hayes PC (2000) A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF in detecting change in quality of life following liver transplantation. Quality of Life Research, 9 (1), pp. 121-124.
Abstract: The World Health Organization has recently produced a generic quality of life measure - the WHOQOL-100, together with an abbreviated version, the WHOQOL-BREF. Preliminary data suggest that the WHOQOL BREF provides a valid and reliable alternative to the lengthier WHOQOL-100. In the present study, the sensitivity to change of both versions was tested pre- and 3 months post liver transplantation in fifty patients and also in twenty-one non-transplanted liver disease controls. Quality of Life domains on both measures were highly correlated, and were sensitive to change following transplant and remained stable on repeat assessment in non-transplanted control patients. However, the sensitivity to change was significantly reduced for the Social domain in the WHOQOL BREF. It is concluded that the WHO-QOL-BREF is a useful alternative to the WHOQOL-100 in evaluating quality of life improvement following major therapeutic interventions for Physical, Psychological and Environmental domains of life quality. However, researchers interested in measuring the Social aspects of life quality may be best advised to use the lengthier WHOQOL-100.
DOI Link: 10.1023/A:1008901320492
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
O'Carroll et al_QLR_2000.pdfFulltext - Published Version73.61 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-30    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.