|Appears in Collections:||Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Correlations among Fertility Components Can Maintain Mixed Mating in Plants|
|Authors:||Johnston, Mark O|
Eckert, Christopher G
Geber, Monica A
Kelly, John K
Moeller, David A
Winn, Alice A
|Citation:||Johnston MO, Porcher E, Cheptou P, Eckert CG, Elle E, Geber MA, Kalisz S, Kelly JK, Moeller DA, Vallejo-Marin M & Winn AA (2009) Correlations among Fertility Components Can Maintain Mixed Mating in Plants, American Naturalist, 173 (1), pp. 1-11.|
|Abstract:||Classical models studying the evolution of self-fertilization in plants conclude that only complete selfing and complete outcrossing are evolutionarily stable. In contrast with this prediction, 42% of seed-plant species are reported to have rates of self-fertilization between 0.2 and 0.8. We propose that many previous models fail to predict intermediate selfing rates because they do not allow for functional relationships among three components of reproductive fitness: self-fertilized ovules, outcrossed ovules, and ovules sired by successful pollen export. Because the optimal design for fertility components may differ, conflicts among the alternative pathways to fitness are possible, and the greatest fertility may be achieved with some self-fertilization. Here we develop and analyze a model to predict optimal selfing rates that includes a range of possible relationships among the three components of reproductive fitness, as well as the effects of evolving inbreeding depression caused by deleterious mutations and of selection on total seed number. We demonstrate that intermediate selfing is optimal for a wide variety of relationships among fitness components and that inbreeding depression is not a good predictor of selfing-rate evolution. Functional relationships subsume the myriad effects of individual plant traits and thus offer a more general and simpler perspective on mating system evolution.|
|Rights:||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in The American Naturalist by The University of Chicago Press for The American Society of Naturalists. The original publication is available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/593705|
|johnstonetal_amernatural_2009.pdf||756.2 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.