Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/824
Appears in Collections: | Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Multi-element soil analysis: an assessment of its potential as an aid to archaeological interpretation |
Author(s): | Wilson, Clare Davidson, Donald Cresser, Malcolm S |
Contact Email: | c.a.wilson@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | Soil Archaeology Geoarchaeology Multi-element analysis Soil science in archaeology. Archaeological geology |
Issue Date: | Feb-2008 |
Date Deposited: | 20-Feb-2009 |
Citation: | Wilson C, Davidson D & Cresser MS (2008) Multi-element soil analysis: an assessment of its potential as an aid to archaeological interpretation. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35 (2), pp. 412-424. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03054403; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2007.04.006 |
Abstract: | Multi-element soil analysis is now an established technique in archaeology. It has been used to locate archaeological sites and define the extent of human activity beyond the structural remains, and to aid interpretation of space use in and around archaeological remains. This study aimed to evaluate the consistency of these soil element signatures between sites and hence their potential usefulness in archaeological studies. Known contexts on abandoned farms across the UK were sampled to test the relationships between element concentrations and known functional area and to assess inter-site variability. The results clearly show that there are significant differences in the soil chemistry of contrasting functional areas, particularly for Ba, Ca, P, Zn, Cu, Sr and Pb. Despite significant site specific effects, which appear to reflect individual anthropogenic practices rather than geological influences, there is sufficient similarity in the pattern of element enhancement to allow reliable interpretation of former function using discriminant models. Relating these enhancements to precise soil inputs, however, is more problematic because many important soil inputs do not contain distinct element fingerprints and because there is mixing of materials within the soil. There is also a suggestion that charcoal and bone play an important role in both the loading and post-depositional retention of Ca, Sr, P, Zn, and Cu and thus may be significant in the formation of soil element concentration patterns. |
URL: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03054403 |
DOI Link: | 10.1016/j.jas.2007.04.006 |
Rights: | Published in Journal of Archaeological Science by Elsevier. |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
pre print in STORRE.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 289.84 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.