|Appears in Collections:||Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||The response of grass-cutting ants to natural and synthetic versions of their alarm pheromone|
|Authors:||Hughes, William O H|
Howse, Philip E
Vilela, Evaldo F
|Citation:||Hughes WOH, Howse PE, Vilela EF & Goulson D (2001) The response of grass-cutting ants to natural and synthetic versions of their alarm pheromone, Physiological Entomology, 26 (2), pp. 165-172.|
|Abstract:||The responses of the grass-cutting ants Atta bisphaerica (Forel) and Atta capiguara (Goncalves) to the main components of their alarm pheromones were examined in simple field bioassays. Both species react most strongly to 4- methyl-3-heptanone, which causes the full range of alarm behaviour and a large increase in the number of individuals near the sources. In later experiments with A. capiguara, this increase was found to be due primarily to attraction, with some arrestment also occurring. The ant response to 4-methyl-3-heptanone was compared with that to crushed heads and to that with whole ants with crushed heads. The pheromone 4-methyl-3-heptanone by itself stimulates the same level of attraction as crushed heads, but results in far less alarm behaviour and arrests fewer ants. Whole ants with crushed heads attract a greater number of ants than the other sources and also cause more alarm behaviour. Bodies alone attract ants, but do not result in alarm behaviour. The main component in both species is the same, supporting the view that alarm pheromones lack species specificity. However, it appears that other components may also be important either as synergists of the main compound, or by stimulating behaviours that would not be observed in its absence.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Affiliation:||University of Southampton|
University of Southampton
Federal University of Vicosa
Biological and Environmental Sciences
|goulson_grasscuttingants_2001.pdf||279.53 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 31/12/2999 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.