Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38318
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The influence of deprivation and pregnancy planning on multiple health behaviour change before pregnancy: a secondary analysis of the Scottish Maternal and Infant Nutrition Survey
Author(s): Welshman, Hannah
Dombrowski, Stephan U
Grant, Aileen
Swanson, Vivien
Currie, Sinéad
Contact Email: sinead.currie@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Preconception
Survey
Health behaviour change
Pregnancy planning
Deprivation
Issue Date: 5-Aug-2026
Date Deposited: 12-Aug-2026
Citation: Welshman H, Dombrowski SU, Grant A, Swanson V & Currie S (2026) The influence of deprivation and pregnancy planning on multiple health behaviour change before pregnancy: a secondary analysis of the Scottish Maternal and Infant Nutrition Survey. <i>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</i>. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-09709-7
Abstract: Background Engaging in multiple, positive health behaviours prior to pregnancy improves health of adults and their future offspring for generations. Socio-demographic factors are often associated with health behaviours and outcomes, e.g. people from more deprived areas are more likely to engage in health risk behaviours during pregnancy and have highest rates of unplanned pregnancies, ultimately perpetuating health inequalities. This secondary analysis aimed to explore how relative deprivation and pregnancy planning status influence multiple health behaviour change before conception. Methods Secondary analysis was conducted on The Scottish Maternal and Infant Nutrition Survey (SMINS), a large-scale survey distributed to pregnant women across Scotland in 2017. Demographic data were collected including a measure of deprivation using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD), along with pregnancy planning status (London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy, LMUP) which includes one question self-reporting behaviour changes prior to pregnancy (e.g. folic acid, smoking, alcohol and diet). A composite score for multiple behaviour change was generated ranging from zero to four where a higher score indicated greater health behaviour changes. Results Of the 2,523 responses, 78% of pregnancies were classed as planned (LMUP 10-12), 19% as ambivalent (LMUP 4-9) and 3% unplanned (LMUP 0-3). There was a significant effect of deprivation on mean composite score for health behaviour change (p<.05) where behaviour change scores in the most deprived quintile, SIMD 1 (M=.93, SD=1.08), were significantly lower than every other SIMD quintile. There was a significant effect of pregnancy planning on multiple behaviour change (p<.001) where multiple health behaviour change was significantly higher in the planned category (M=1.5, SD=1.06) than the ambivalent category (M=0.23, SD=0.60) and the unplanned category (M=0.04, SD=0.26). Overall change in multiple health behaviours was low. Across all participants, there was a higher degree of psychological planning compared to behavioural planning. Conclusions There is sub-optimal engagement in multiple health behaviour change before conception. However, this is particularly low among non-planners and people living in areas of higher deprivation. Individuals psychologically prepare for pregnancy more than they behaviourally prepare. Lack of behavioural preparation can have negative impacts on the physical health of women and babies.
DOI Link: 10.1186/s12884-026-09709-7
Rights: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12884-026-09709-7_reference.pdfFulltext - Published Version867.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.