Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38315| Appears in Collections: | Computing Science and Mathematics Journal Articles |
| Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
| Title: | GCE: A Framework for Interpretable Nonlinear Hazard Modeling in Cardiac Sarcoma Survival Using SEER Data |
| Author(s): | Kareem, Muhammad Shoaib Amjad, Madiha Aslam, Saba Rasool, Abdur Jamil, Mutiullah Ali, Hazrat |
| Contact Email: | ali.hazrat@stir.ac.uk |
| Keywords: | cardiac sarcoma survival analysis cox proportional hazards single-step static covariates nonlinear risk modeling post hoc SHAP association SEER database |
| Issue Date: | 1-Aug-2026 |
| Date Deposited: | 15-Aug-2026 |
| Citation: | Kareem MS, Amjad M, Aslam S, Rasool A, Jamil M & Ali H (2026) GCE: A Framework for Interpretable Nonlinear Hazard Modeling in Cardiac Sarcoma Survival Using SEER Data. <i>Bioengineering</i>, 13 (8), Art. No.: 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13080891 |
| Abstract: | Cardiac sarcoma is a rare aggressive malignancy for which survival prediction is limited by small cohorts, censoring, nonlinear prognostic effects, and incomplete interpretability. We developed the GRU–CoxPH Ensemble (GCE), a weighted late-fusion survival framework combining a single-step GRU static-covariate learner with Cox proportional hazards (CoxPHs). Using SEER Research Plus data, 727 eligible patients were identified from 41 source variables, and 27 raw SEER predictors were retained after leakage exclusion and Cox-LASSO/Random Survival Forest screening. Outcome, follow-up, cause-of-death, identifier, and endpoint-derived fields were removed before preprocessing; imputation, encoding, scaling, feature selection, tuning, and ensemble-weight selection were performed within training folds only. In leakage-free 10-fold out-of-fold evaluation, the GCE achieved high cohort-specific internal discrimination that is likely optimistic and requires external validation (mean C-index =0.9198; IBS = 0.03641), whereas CoxPH showed lower discrimination (C-index = 0.8605) but better IBS calibration (0.03378). Thus, the GCE is better for discrimination, under internal validation, and is not calibration-superior. SHAP provided post hoc descriptive association summaries for the final ensemble risk score. These internal results support the GCE only as a research framework for cardiac sarcoma survival-risk modeling; external validation and recalibration are required before any patient-level clinical consideration. |
| DOI Link: | 10.3390/bioengineering13080891 |
| Rights: | This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. |
| Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bioengineering-13-00891.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 6.86 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.
