Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37964
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Unpacking willpower in unassisted smoking cessation: a qualitative analysis reveals a systematic profile of situational and cognitive strategies
Author(s): Marathia, Effie
Duffy, Sheila
Stephen, Abigail
More, Kimberly R
Saunders, Blair
Contact Email: effie.marathia@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Unassisted smoking cessation
self-regulation
strategies
behaviour change techniques
public health policy
Issue Date: 14-Mar-2026
Date Deposited: 16-Mar-2026
Citation: Marathia E, Duffy S, Stephen A, More KR & Saunders B (2026) Unpacking willpower in unassisted smoking cessation: a qualitative analysis reveals a systematic profile of situational and cognitive strategies. <i>Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine</i>, 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2026.2644658
Abstract: Background: Over half of those who quit smoking do so without formal assistance, yet the psychological processes supporting unassisted cessation remain little understood.Success is often attributed to willpower, an umbrella term that lacks explanator precision and obscures the underlying tractable processes. Drawing on the Process Model of Self-Regulation and the Behavior Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy, this study aimed to identify the concrete strategies that enable individuals to quit smoking unassisted, thereby clarifying what willpower might look like in practice. Materials and methods: Thirty-two participants who had successfully quit smoking without formal support participated in semi-structured interviews. Inductive content analysis identified key challenges, while deductive coding mapped strategies addressing these challenges to the Process Model of Self-Regulation and the BCT Taxonomy. Results: Participants’ accounts reflected a diverse range of strategies, averaging seven distinct BCTs, spanning the Situation Selection and Modification, Attention Redeployment, and Cognitive Change stages from the Process Model. Common BCTs included avoiding environmental triggers, substituting smoking with alternative behav-iors, and seeking social support. In contrast, Response Modulation (e.g. ‘just say no’)accounted for only 1% of the data. Conclusion: Unassisted quitters drew from a sophisticated repertoire of strategies that are actionable, teachable, and embedded within the individual’s physical and social environment. The qualitative methodology used in this study offers an understanding of the lived experiences of self-quitters, potentially informing public health interventions that integrate individual and system-level approaches to behavior change that extend beyond brute-force willpower.
DOI Link: 10.1080/21642850.2026.2644658
Rights: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.