Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37849| Appears in Collections: | Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles |
| Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
| Title: | Rethinking socio-cultural resistance: Systemic factors behind successful and failed transitions to toilet-linked anaerobic digesters in Nepal and India |
| Author(s): | Boyd Williams, Natalie Campbell, Ben Raha, Debadayita Baruah, Debendra Chandra Kalina, Marc Tilley, Elizabeth Dickie, Jennifer |
| Contact Email: | j.a.dickie@stir.ac.uk |
| Issue Date: | Jan-2026 |
| Date Deposited: | 12-Jan-2026 |
| Citation: | Boyd Williams N, Campbell B, Raha D, Baruah DC, Kalina M, Tilley E & Dickie J (2026) Rethinking socio-cultural resistance: Systemic factors behind successful and failed transitions to toilet-linked anaerobic digesters in Nepal and India. <i>Energy Research & Social Science</i>, 131, Art. No.: 104496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104496 |
| Abstract: | Toilet-linked anaerobic digesters (TLADs) are promoted as technologies that can simultaneously address household energy, sanitation, and agricultural needs, yet diffusion remains uneven, and project failures are frequently attributed to “socio-cultural resistance.” This paper challenges that narrative by examining why Nepal's domestic biogas programme achieved greater success in implementing TLADs than India's, despite broadly similar policies and rural socio-economic conditions. Using a sustainability transitions framework, we conduct a comparative case study of successful adoption in Nepal's Gandaki Province with non-adoption in Assam, India. The study draws on 57 household interviews, 15 expert-stakeholder interviews, and policy and programme documents. Findings indicate that while socio-cultural norms influence TLAD diffusion, they are not stand-alone determinants of household transitions. Instead, these norms interact with programme design, governance structures, institutional commitment, and wider policy environments, and are conditioned by local socio-technical contexts. These interactions shape how socio-cultural norms manifest in relation to technology adoption at the household level. We argue that failed transitions are too often attributed disproportionately to socio-cultural resistance—a framing that unfairly shifts responsibility onto households while obscuring systemic shortcomings such as inadequate targeting, weak institutional support, and misalignment between technologies and local contexts. A more balanced framing should acknowledge socio-cultural norms while situating them within broader socio-technical and policy environments. Such reframing could shift research and practice away from narratives of household blame and towards critical assessments of contextual fit, programme capacity, and policy coherence, supporting more equitable and context-appropriate transitions in sanitation and household energy systems such as TLADs. |
| DOI Link: | 10.1016/j.erss.2025.104496 |
| Rights: | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article. |
| Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boyd Williams et al Rethinking socio-cultural resistance.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 1 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.
