Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37747| Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
| Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
| Title: | Uptake, retention and delivery of community dietary interventions within low socioeconomic populations: Systematic review |
| Author(s): | Stephen, Abigail Allan, Julia Petre, Oana Kyle, Janet Thies, Frank |
| Contact Email: | julia.allan@stir.ac.uk |
| Keywords: | Socioeconomic status dietary interventions uptake retention community-based |
| Issue Date: | 18-Dec-2025 |
| Date Deposited: | 9-Oct-2025 |
| Citation: | Stephen A, Allan J, Petre O, Kyle J & Thies F (2025) Uptake, retention and delivery of community dietary interventions within low socioeconomic populations: Systematic review. |
| Abstract: | Objectives: To evaluate levels of uptake and retention in community-based dietary interventions for low socioeconomic status (SES) populations, to identify barriers and facilitators of uptake and retention, and to compare the characteristics of interventions with optimal and suboptimal uptake and retention. Method and measures: Databases were searched for relevant records published before March 2024. N=114 papers met the inclusion criteria. Data were narratively synthesised, and intervention content was coded for behaviour change techniques (BCT). Results: Uptake and retention were suboptimal at an average of 80% and 71%, respectively. Interventions with higher uptake and/or retention were shorter in duration, more likely to be group-based and more likely to include the BCT ‘providing information about health consequences’. A thematic analysis of barriers and facilitators identified that logistical challenges, socioeconomic factors, and low motivation hindered uptake and retention, while social support, practical assistance, and the provision of tailored interventions facilitated it. Conclusions: These results highlight the need to improve participant engagement and retention strategies in dietary interventions targeting low SES individuals by, for example, implementing different behaviour change techniques, altering the duration, setting or delivery of interventions and tailoring interventions to align them with the unique needs of this population group. |
| DOI Link: | 10.1080/08870446.2025.2602139 |
| Rights: | © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
| Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uptake retention and delivery of community dietary interventions within low socioeconomic populations.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 5.85 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.
