Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37515
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Changes in Key Biodiversity Area networks following national comprehensive assessments
Author(s): Plumptre, Andrew J
Waliczky, Zoltan
Baisero, Daniele
Crowe, Olivia
Kivono, Jeannot
Tobar, Cecilia
Toscano, Maria Gabriela
Costa, Hugo
Dirou, Sophie
Duarte, Eleuterio
Fierro, Karolina
Castellanos-Castro, Carolina
Maisels, Fiona
Marnewick, Daniel
Moundzoho, Dissondet
Nampindo, Simon
Nangendo, Grace
Neugarten, Rachel
Contact Email: boo.maisels@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: biodiversity assessment
conservation planning
Convention on Biological Diversity
Key Biodiversity Area
Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework
Issue Date: 30-Sep-2025
Date Deposited: 14-Oct-2025
Citation: Plumptre AJ, Waliczky Z, Baisero D, Crowe O, Kivono J, Tobar C, Toscano MG, Costa H, Dirou S, Duarte E, Fierro K, Castellanos-Castro C, Maisels F, Marnewick D, Moundzoho D, Nampindo S, Nangendo G & Neugarten R (2025) Changes in Key Biodiversity Area networks following national comprehensive assessments. <i>Conservation Biology</i>. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.70151; https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70151
Abstract: Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are sites of significance for the global persistence of biodiversity. Based on the Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA Standard), published in 2016, sites are currently being assessed for KBA designation in a growing number of countries across the world. For these assessments, the KBA criteria are applied to all species and ecosystems with available data. We reviewed the first comprehensive assessments of 11 countries and compared the KBA network before and after assessments. The mean (SD) number of KBAs per country increased by 69.6% (102.1), and the mean total extent of KBAs per country increased by 164.2% (150.7). More than half of the KBAs in 2024 had >50% of their area outside the 2019 KBAs, indicating a substantial increase in KBA extent (54.0% [18.8] of KBAs). The mean proportion of each KBA covered by protected or conserved areas decreased from 56.2% (20.2) to 44.5% (15.5), owing to the incorporation of unprotected sites in the KBA network. On average, 41.1% (14.0) of sites in each country (mean 44.5 [46.4] sites per country) and 47.2% (20.5) of new KBA area after the assessment were completely unprotected, indicating that many of the new sites were not recognized in national protected area networks as significant for biodiversity before the assessment. Making a comprehensive assessment of KBAs increased the combined coverage of protected and conserved area networks from 25.4% (10.6) to 32.0% (13.1) in each country and thus contributed to reducing biodiversity loss. Therefore, comprehensive assessments of KBAs led to a substantially increased number and extent of recognized sites of importance for biodiversity published in the World Database of KBAs. Where such assessments have not been made, many important areas for biodiversity may be overlooked. We therefore encourage other nations to update their KBA networks to inform efforts to meet the goals and targets of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
URL: https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.70151
DOI Link: 10.1111/cobi.70151
Rights: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.© 2025 The Author(s). Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Plumptre et al 2025 - Changes in Key Biodiversity Area networks following national comprehensive.pdfFulltext - Published Version657.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.