Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34238
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurrows, Jessicaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCopplestone, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorBeresford, Nicken_UK
dc.contributor.authorRaines, Katherineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTinsley, Matthewen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-30T00:31:50Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-30T00:31:50Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-27en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34238-
dc.description.abstract(1) Exposure to radiation is a natural part of our environment. Yet, due to nuclear accidents such as at Chernobyl, some organisms are exposed to significantly elevated dose rates. Our understanding of the effects of radiation in the environment is limited, confounded by substantial interspecific differences in radio-sensitivity and conflicting findings. (2) Here we study radiation impacts on bumblebees in the laboratory using principles from life history theory, which assume organismal investment in fitness-related traits is constrained by resource availability and resource allocation decisions. To investigate how chronic radiation might negatively affect life history traits, we tested if exposure affects bumblebee energy budgets by studying resource acquisition (feeding) and resource use (metabolic rate). (3) We monitored metabolic rate, movement and nectar intake of bumblebees before, during and after 10 days of radiation exposure. Subsequently, we monitored feeding and body mass across a dose rate gradient to investigate the dose rate threshold for these effects. We studied dose rates up to 200 μGy hr-1: a range found today in some areas of the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. (4) Chronic low dose radiation affected bumblebee energy budgets. At 200 μGy hr-1 nectar consumption elevated by 56% relative to controls, metabolic CO2 production increased by 18%, and time spent active rose by 30%. Once radiation exposure stopped, feeding remained elevated but CO2 production and activity returned to baseline. Our analysis indicates that elevated metabolic rate was not driven by increased activity but was instead closely associated with feeding increases. Our data suggest bumblebee nectar consumption was affected across the 50-200 μGy hr-1 range. (5) We show field-realistic radiation exposure influences fundamental metabolic processes with potential to drive changes in many downstream life history traits. We hypothesise that radiation may trigger energetically costly repair mechanisms, increasing metabolic rate and nectar requirements. This change could have significant ecological consequences in contaminated landscapes, including Chernobyl. We demonstrate bumblebees are more sensitive to radiation than assumed by existing international frameworks for environmental radiological protection.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationBurrows J, Copplestone D, Beresford N, Raines K & Tinsley M (2022) Ecologically relevant radiation exposure triggers elevated metabolic rate and nectar consumption in bumblebees. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14067en_UK
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Functional Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectIonising radiationen_UK
dc.subjectLife historyen_UK
dc.subjectInsectsen_UK
dc.subjectResource allocationen_UK
dc.subjectPollinatoren_UK
dc.subjectEnergy budgeten_UK
dc.subjectEco-toxicologyen_UK
dc.subjectRadiological contaminationen_UK
dc.titleEcologically relevant radiation exposure triggers elevated metabolic rate and nectar consumption in bumblebeesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2022-05-27en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2435.14067en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFunctional Ecologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1365-2435en_UK
dc.citation.issn0269-8463en_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAO - Author's Originalen_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailj.e.burrows@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date27/05/2022en_UK
dc.description.notesOutput Status: Forthcoming/Available Onlineen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000805387200001en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1812161en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0239-4053en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1468-9545en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7864-0126en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7715-1259en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-04-27en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-04-27en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-04-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBurrows, Jessica|0000-0002-0239-4053en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCopplestone, David|0000-0002-1468-9545en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBeresford, Nick|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRaines, Katherine|0000-0002-7864-0126en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTinsley, Matthew|0000-0002-7715-1259en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-05-27en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2022-05-27en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-05-27|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameBurrows-etal-FE-2022.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount2en_UK
local.rioxx.source1365-2435en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Functional Ecology Figure 5.pdfSupporting Information156.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Functional Ecology Figure 4.pdfSupporting Information183.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Functional Ecology Figure 3.pdfSupporting Information156.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Functional Ecology Figure 2.pdfSupporting Information193.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Functional Ecology Figure 1.pdfSupporting Information172.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Supplementary Materials Paper 1 FE-2021-00853.pdfSupporting Information1.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Burrows-etal-FE-2022.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.