Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33893
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Recycling of Ornamental Stones Hazardous Wastes
Author(s): Soltan, Abdel Monem
Taman, Zeinab
El Kaliouby, Bahar
Keywords: Recycling
Ornamental Stones
Wastes
Microstructure
Quicklime
Issue Date: Dec-2011
Date Deposited: 27-Jan-2022
Citation: Soltan AM, Taman Z & El Kaliouby B (2011) Recycling of Ornamental Stones Hazardous Wastes. Natural Resources, 2 (4), pp. 244-249. https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2011.24031
Abstract: Sawing and polishing of the ornamental stones always generate large amount of solid and wet hazardous wastes, which pollute the environment. In Shak Al-Thoaban area, East Cairo, Egypt, huge amounts of these wastes were accumulated, during the last years, as rejects “Solid” and wet “Sahala” wastes, representing one of the main sources of environmentalpollution. The aim of this work is to characterize and evaluate these wastes for recycling in quicklime production. Hence, samples of both wastes were investigated for their chemical and mineral composition applying XRF, XRD, DTA and TGA methods. Free lime content and reactivity (RDIN) of both samples were also determined after calcination for differnt soaking times (0.25 - 2.0 h) at 1000˚C. The results were interpreted in relation to composition and microstructure of the fired samples as revealed by TLM and SEM methods. The RDIN reactivity of the resulted lime is changeable along soaking time at 1000˚C because of the microfabric of its crystallites. The lime of the “Solid” sample is preserving the original limestone microstructure that contributes in its higher RDIN reactivity values at all soaking times. The relatively higher degree of grain growth of lime crystallites in the “Sahala” sample leads to its lower reactivity.The optimum soaking times for the highest lime reactivity are 0.25 and 1 h for the “Solid” and “Sahala” samples, respectively. On increasing soaking time up to 2 h, both samples show minimum RDIN values. The “Solid” sample also gives higher free lime content than the “Sahala” one at all soaking times. It is gradually increased in the former sample up to a maximum (96% - 97%) on increasing soaking time up to 1 - 2 h. On the other side, a maximum free lime (~95%) is detected in “Sahala” sample at 0.25 h soaking time and gradually decreased to (87%) up to 2 h.
DOI Link: 10.4236/nr.2011.24031
Rights: Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NR20110400003_77530025.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.