Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33883
Appears in Collections: | Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Mudrock Microstructure: A Technique for Distinguishing between Deep-Water Fine-Grained Sediments |
Author(s): | Bankole, Shereef Stow, Dorrik Smillie, Zeinab Buckman, Jim Lever, Helen |
Keywords: | deep-water fine-grained sediments turbidites contourites hemipelagites |
Issue Date: | Jun-2021 |
Date Deposited: | 25-Jan-2022 |
Citation: | Bankole S, Stow D, Smillie Z, Buckman J & Lever H (2021) Mudrock Microstructure: A Technique for Distinguishing between Deep-Water Fine-Grained Sediments. Minerals, 11 (6), Art. No.: 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11060653 |
Abstract: | Distinguishing among deep-water sedimentary facies has been a difficult task. This is possibly due to the process continuum in deep water, in which sediments occur in complex associations. The lack of definite sedimentological features among the different facies between hemipelagites and contourites presented a great challenge. In this study, we present detailed mudrock characteristics of the three main deep-water facies based on sedimentological characteristics, laser diffraction granulometry, high-resolution, large area scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the synchrotron X-ray diffraction technique. Our results show that the deep-water microstructure is mainly process controlled, and that the controlling factor on their grain size is much more complex than previously envisaged. Retarding current velocity, as well as the lower carrying capacity of the current, has an impact on the mean size and sorting for the contourite and turbidite facies, whereas hemipelagite grain size is impacted by the natural heterogeneity of the system caused by bioturbation. Based on the microfabric analysis, there is a disparate pattern observed among the sedimentary facies; turbidites are generally bedding parallel due to strong currents resulting in shear flow, contourites are random to semi-random as they are impacted by a weak current, while hemipelagites are random to oblique since they are impacted by bioturbation. |
DOI Link: | 10.3390/min11060653 |
Rights: | © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
minerals-11-00653-v3.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 20.47 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.