Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33565
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: From normal response to clinical problem: definition and clinical features of fear of cancer recurrence
Author(s): Lebel, Sophie
Ozakinci, Gozde
Humphris, Gerald
Mutsaers, Brittany
Thewes, Belinda
Prins, Judith
Dinkel, Andreas
Butow, Phyllis
Keywords: Fear of cancer recurrence
Clinical fear of cancer recurrence
Delphi study
Expert opinion
Definition
Psychosocial oncology
Issue Date: Aug-2016
Date Deposited: 5-Nov-2021
Citation: Lebel S, Ozakinci G, Humphris G, Mutsaers B, Thewes B, Prins J, Dinkel A & Butow P (2016) From normal response to clinical problem: definition and clinical features of fear of cancer recurrence. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24 (8), pp. 3265-3268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3272-5
Abstract: Purpose Research to date on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) shows that moderate to high FCR affects 22–87 % of cancer survivors and is associated with higher psychological morbidity (Simard et al J Cancer Surviv 7:300–322, 2013). Despite growing research interest in FCR, the lack of consensus on its definition and characteristics when it reaches a clinical level has impeded knowledge transfer into patient services. Methods In order to address these gaps, expert researchers, policy makers, trainees, and patient advocates attended a 2-day colloquium at the University of Ottawa in August 2015. A Delphi method was used to identify the most relevant definition of FCR, and the attendees generated possible diagnostic characteristics of clinical FCR. Results After three rounds of discussion and voting, the attendees reached consensus on a new definition of FCR: “Fear, worry, or concern relating to the possibility that cancer will come back or progress.” Regarding clinical FCR, five possible characteristics were proposed: (1) high levels of preoccupation, worry, rumination, or intrusive thoughts; (2) maladaptive coping; (3) functional impairments; (4) excessive distress; and (5) difficulties making plans for the future. Conclusions The new proposed definition of FCR reflects the broad spectrum in which patients experience FCR. A consensual definition of FCR and the identification of the essential characteristics of clinical FCR are necessary to accurately and consistently measure FCR severity and to develop effective interventions to treat FCR. We hope this broad definition can encourage further research and the development of inclusive policies for all cancer patients and survivors who are struggling with this issue.
DOI Link: 10.1007/s00520-016-3272-5
Rights: This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Supportive Care in Cancer. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3272-5
Licence URL(s): https://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ozakinci_2016_SCC_NormalResponse_AcceptedManuscript.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version492.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.