Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33239
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Challenging issues of integrity and identity of participants in non-synchronous online qualitative methods |
Author(s): | Jones, Abigail Caes, Line Rugg, Tessa Noel, Melanie Bateman, Sharon Jordan, Abbie |
Keywords: | Quality Fraud Online |
Issue Date: | Dec-2021 |
Date Deposited: | 6-Sep-2021 |
Citation: | Jones A, Caes L, Rugg T, Noel M, Bateman S & Jordan A (2021) Challenging issues of integrity and identity of participants in non-synchronous online qualitative methods. Methods in Psychology, 5, Art. No.: 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100072 |
Abstract: | Qualitative data collection is increasingly occurring online, with data collection methods often lacking the synchronous contact between researchers and participants present in more traditional methods of qualitative data collection such as face-to-face interviews. Despite numerous benefits of non-synchronous online methods of qualitative data collection, such methods also pose unique challenges concerning participant eligibility and data quality in the qualitative domain. Due to a longer tradition of conducting non-synchronous quantitative online data collection, researchers have discussed issues related to data quality for use within quantitative research, and developed techniques to address such issues. However, such discussions have not taken place within qualitative research and due to the differences in types of data and theoretical underpinnings, only some of the techniques developed in quantitative research can be appropriately applied in qualitative research. In this paper, we address this knowledge gap by providing an important ‘how to guide’, presenting techniques to help address threats to data quality and integrity in non-synchronous online qualitative research. We start by outlining techniques developed for use in quantitative research that can be appropriately transferred to qualitative paradigms, before proposing techniques to manage challenges faced specifically by non-synchronous online qualitative research. We go on to discuss some of the potential pitfalls which can prevent the implementation of these techniques and how to overcome them. Finally, we urge researchers to be transparent about the techniques they implement to optimise data quality and to adopt a proactive rather than reactive approach to maximising data quality in qualitative research studies. |
DOI Link: | 10.1016/j.metip.2021.100072 |
Rights: | This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 7.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S2590260121000291-main (1).pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 388.89 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.