|Appears in Collections:||Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||The function of female behaviours adopted during premating struggles in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida|
|Authors:||Blyth, Jennifer E|
|Citation:||Blyth JE & Gilburn A (2011) The function of female behaviours adopted during premating struggles in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Animal Behaviour, 81 (1), pp. 77-82.|
|Abstract:||The mating system of sciomyzoid flies is typified by vigorous premating struggles and a large male mating advantage. Females commonly exhibit three behaviours (shaking, kicking and curling) during struggles. We tested the predictions of three hypotheses proposed to explain the evolution of female resistance in Coelopa frigida. Both shaking and curling were associated with reduced female mating rate and thus appear to be resistance traits. Mounts that ended while the female was curling appeared to be terminated by the male dismounting from the female rather than as a result of resistance. The communication hypothesis proposes that female resistance functions by signalling to the male that the female is unwilling to mate to encourage males to dismount them. Curling therefore seems to fit the predictions of the communication hypothesis. Shaking was associated with sexual selection for large male size and also males that could withstand resistance the longest. These observations fit with the predictions of both the female reluctance and screening hypotheses. Furthermore, shaking was associated with a pattern of mating that increased offspring fitness. This did not occur in females that did not shake. This corresponds with the predictions of the screening hypothesis that resistance generates indirect sexual selection. However, our results are also largely consistent with the female reluctance hypothesis. It appears that different resistance behaviours may have different functions, and furthermore that individual resistance behaviours might generate different mating rates and patterns of sexual selection between female karyotypes.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Blyth & Gilburn 2011.pdf||450.69 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 31/12/2999 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependant on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.