Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33054
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Personality Structure in Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)
Author(s): Morton, F Blake
Robinson, Lauren M
Brando, Sabrina
Weiss, Alexander
Keywords: bottlenose dolphin
cetacean
comparative personality
convergent evolution
primate personality
Issue Date: 2021
Date Deposited: 5-Aug-2021
Citation: Morton FB, Robinson LM, Brando S & Weiss A (2021) Personality Structure in Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 135 (5), pp. 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000259
Abstract: Comparative studies can help identify selective pressures that contributed to species differences in the number and composition of personality domains. Despite being adapted to an aquatic lifestyle and last sharing a common ancestor with primates some 95 million years ago, bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) resemble nonhuman primate species in several behavioral and cognitive traits. For example, like chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), dolphins live in fission–fusion societies, use tools, and have relatively large brains. To determine the extent to which these and other factors contribute to the evolution of dolphin personality, we examined personality structure in 134 bottlenose dolphins. Personality was measured in 49 dolphins using a 42-item questionnaire, and in 85 dolphins using a version of the questionnaire that included 7 additional items. We found four domains. Three—Openness, Sociability, and Disagreeableness—resembled personality domains found in nonhuman primates and other species. The fourth, Directedness, was a blend of high Conscientiousness and low Neuroticism and was unique to dolphins. Unlike other species, but like humans, dolphins did not appear to have a strong Dominance domain. The overlap in personality structure between dolphins and other species suggests that selective pressures, such as those related to group structure, terrestrial lifestyles, morphology, and social learning or tool use are not necessary for particular domains to evolve within a species.
DOI Link: 10.1037/com0000259
Rights: ©American Psychological Association, 2021. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000259

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Manuscript_Final_17_Sep_2020.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version362.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.