Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32134
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPoikane, Sandraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVárbíró, Gaboren_UK
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Martyn Gen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBirk, Sebastianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Geoffen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T08:11:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-08T08:11:00Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02en_UK
dc.identifier.other107017en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/32134-
dc.description.abstractNutrient pollution remains one of the leading causes of river degradation, making it important to set thresholds that support good ecological condition, which is the main objective of managing Europe's aquatic environment. A wide range of methods has been used by European member states to set river nutrient thresholds in the past, and these vary greatly among countries, even for similar river types. In some countries, thresholds have been set using expert judgement or the statistical distribution of nutrient concentrations. Application of such thresholds creates problems for planning strategies to achieve good ecological status and for managing transboundary river basins. An alternative approach is to examine the statistical relationship between nutrient concentration and one, or more, biological variables. Such relationships can then be used to inform decisions by water managers. We use such 'ecology-based' approaches (univariate regression and mismatch analyses) to derive nutrient thresholds for several river types in Central Europe. Our analysis focused on soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) and total nitrogen (TN), two variables which were responsible for significant variation (40–55%) in river benthic floras. In this study, for the first time, river nutrient thresholds are estimated using both macrophytes and phytobenthos (EQRs) separately and in combination, calculated as the minimum and the average of the EQRs of the two sub-elements. The resulting thresholds supporting good ecological status range from 21 to 42 µg/L SRP and 0.9–3.5 mg/L TN for the low alkalinity lowland river type, and 32–90 µg/L SRP and 1.0–2.5 mg/L TN for the low alkalinity mid-altitude river type. These targets are compared to the values set by member states. We demonstrate that some national nutrient thresholds fall within the range of predicted values if uncertainty is taken into consideration; however, several threshold values considerably exceed this range. Adopting ecology-based nutrient targets should improve sustainable river management where nutrients are the major pressure preventing the achievement of good ecological status.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationPoikane S, Várbíró G, Kelly MG, Birk S & Phillips G (2021) Estimating river nutrient concentrations consistent with good ecological condition: More stringent nutrient thresholds needed. Ecological Indicators, 121, Art. No.: 107017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107017en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectEutrophicationen_UK
dc.subjectEcological statusen_UK
dc.subjectPhosphorusen_UK
dc.subjectNitrogenen_UK
dc.subjectRiversen_UK
dc.subjectNutrient targetsen_UK
dc.titleEstimating river nutrient concentrations consistent with good ecological condition: More stringent nutrient thresholds neededen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107017en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEcological Indicatorsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1470-160Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume121en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date30/11/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEuropean Commissionen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecological Research (Hungary)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Duisburg-Essenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000604882200012en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85097348144en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1692680en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-09-26en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-26en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2021-01-07en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorPoikane, Sandra|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVárbíró, Gabor|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKelly, Martyn G|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBirk, Sebastian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPhillips, Geoff|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-01-07en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2021-01-07|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S1470160X20309560-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1470-160Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1470160X20309560-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version3.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.