|Appears in Collections:||Economics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||History of Thought and Methodology in Pluralist Economics Education|
history of economic thought
|Citation:||Dow S (2009) History of Thought and Methodology in Pluralist Economics Education, International Review of Economics Education, 8 (2), pp. 41-57.|
|Abstract:||The purpose of the paper is to develop the argument that history of thought and methodology should form part of the content of pluralist teaching in economics, where the aim of this teaching is taken to equip students to exercise their own judgement as economists. Discussion of the nature and scope of economics, with examples from history, helps students understand what is involved in considering a range of approaches and methods (rather than uncritically accepting one general approach, but without resorting to ‘anything goes’). A way of teaching about the current crisis is used as an exemplar.|
|Rights:||The publisher has granted permission for use of this article in this Repository. The article, Sheila C. Dow, History of Thought and Methodology in Pluralist Economics Education, International Review of Economics Education (IREE), Volume 8, Issue 2, pp. 41 - 57, was first published in International Review of Economics Education (IREE) by Economics Network, University of Bristol. The full text of the publisher's version of this article is available from the journal web pages: http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/iree|
|Notes:||The full text of the publisher's version of this article is available from the journal web pages: http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/iree|
|2009 pluralist_teaching_paper_130909.pdf||118.36 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.